|
|
|
 |
|

March 4th, 2004, 02:52 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Since we most likely have only 20 tags, how about making the SECOND digit specify what type of component it is, and the FIRST (the zero/one/two) specify the grade of component?
If only Aaron would make it 999 tags or something... it would have been SO easy to do that instead of 20 
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:08 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
So you want the capacity for 999 tags ?
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:19 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Ed Kolis:
Since we most likely have only 20 tags, how about making the SECOND digit specify what type of component it is, and the FIRST (the zero/one/two) specify the grade of component?
|
I suppose. It might not work for every mod, but perhaps most.
Technically, it only gives 2 Versions for each type of component - but then some components might be given multiple "second digits" - such as armor which I suspect will be the biggest employer of ai tags (especially if leaky!).
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:23 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Yeah that leaky armour is something that comes up alot
ANother reason i would like to see armour expanded more and refined and the leaky armour thing modified say for a Version 2 realise.
Version 1.91 really doesnt represent the end effort though - or we could just leave it as is and move to waiting for SE5
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:23 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Although 20 seems low, you'll actually be hard press to put them all into action, unless you start having 3 "grades" of every component.
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:26 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Paul1980au:
Another reason i would like to see armour expanded more and refined and the leaky armour thing modified say for a Version 2 realise.
|
Seriously. Will you knock it off with Version 2 release stuff, it's not going to happen.
At the very most, we might see a 1.92 if this memory error problem turns out to be a significant bug, but other than that, SE:V is going to be the only pot on MM's stove.
And it's much welcomed...
[ March 04, 2004, 01:27: Message edited by: Captain Kwok ]
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:27 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Quote:
Version 1.91 really doesnt represent the end effort though
|
And on what do you base this claim? It most certainly represents the "end effort," as it is the final patch for SE4.
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:29 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
How can the TDM guys use AI tags anyway? The stock game has no components with them, so mentioning them in the AI files is useless.
|
Agree with you...
|

March 4th, 2004, 03:31 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
You know that more than 3 grades for each component if you have the time to modify makes the game much more dynamic and long Lasting with a more indepth research tree taking longer to complete.
The error memory would be enough to put out at least Version 1.92.
|

March 4th, 2004, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 907
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI Tag Standardization Proposal
"quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
How can the TDM guys use AI tags anyway? The stock game has no components with them, so mentioning them in the AI files is useless.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with you... "
My main idea about this was to have a standard set of tags for basic se4 (ie, tag 1 is Null-Space weapons, tag 2 is tractor beams, tag 3 is Rad Bombs ...etc).. I just remember alot of the AI guys wishing they could put more than 2 weapons on a ship to make them more 'personal' and with this system they could and anyone could design an AI or new shipset that would take advantage of this system of new tags and have it work with 'basic se4' where the addition of the AI tags was the ONLY modification to the game. (I'd just love to see what most of these guys could come up with for their 'babies'.)
__________________
We are all...the sum of our scars....(paraphrased) Matt. R. Stover-'Blade of Tyshalle'.
Human existance is all imagination...Reality is no more than a simple agreement among its participants that this is where we shall meet, and these are the rules that we shall abide by.- Kevin McCarthy/David Silva The Family:Special Effects..
Long Live the Legion!!-Comic book fandom...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|