|
|
|
|
 |
|
March 9th, 2004, 03:07 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
If this go ahead, there should be a minimum quality setting as well of at least 16-bit stereo. Files below this level can be saved in higher quality using sound recorder that comes with windows.
|
March 9th, 2004, 03:08 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
3) All sounds must be prefixed with a group identifier, such as "Fyron_Laser.wav". This is because sounds can have arbitrary names, so it is entirely possible that someone else wants to add a Laser.wav sound.
|
Okay, I submitted two sounds with the stm prefix for Atrocities Star Trek Mod (stm).
An alternate sound for the Depleted Uranium Cannon and the Borg Ripper Beam.
My time is limited on the weekdays so I'll submitted a lot more towards the weekend. |
March 9th, 2004, 03:12 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
Quote:
Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
If this go ahead, there should be a minimum quality setting as well of at least 16-bit stereo. Files below this level can be saved in higher quality using sound recorder that comes with windows.
|
Yes, but will that actually change the audio quality, or just take up more space?  |
March 9th, 2004, 03:19 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
It does take up a little bit more space, but it does make a noticeable difference. Just compare some of the original SE:IV sounds with the newer ones.
|
March 9th, 2004, 03:37 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
Yeah, but wasn't a bit more than just resaving them from a low quality format to a high quality format done?
|
March 9th, 2004, 03:39 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Yeah, but wasn't a bit more than just resaving them from a low quality format to a high quality format done?
|
Sure. But even just saving some of the crappy mono sounds to stereo helps... |
March 10th, 2004, 04:54 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rosario, Argentina
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
You will only notice the difference if you have a good set of speakers and the volume relatively high.
|
January 8th, 2005, 07:12 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
Ugh... why did I have to delete a bunch of old emails? No longer have the submissions that had been emailed to me Last year...  I have CW's submission and the old Version of TampaSoundMod that was linked to, but the others are gone. |
January 8th, 2005, 08:37 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
Thread necromancy! Thread necromancy!
|
January 8th, 2005, 08:40 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Sound Pack
This isn't thread necromancy, it is project necromancy.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode