|
|
|
|
 |

March 25th, 2004, 04:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
Quote:
|
Dogscoff, what your saying is that they may develop a fear reaction, but they won't be feeling fear?
|
Well, if it serves the same purpose as fear, and it provokes the same response as fear... why don't we just call it fear? There will undoubtedly be biological differences but the end result is the same. After all, how do i know that when *you* feel fear you feel the same thing as me? How do I know you don't see red as what I would call call blue?
It's like the Turing test for AI: You can't know for sure whether a machine is actually intelligent or just doing a really good impression of one that is, but when it gets to that stage there's very little point trying to tell the difference anyway.
|

March 25th, 2004, 04:55 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
No, I was never aware that there were 15 other Types. (a Type is above a Genus, right? or is that a Family? I cant remember much biology) But I would be very interested if you could post links to information.
It would be good for fictional race creation, if not edification for its own sake.
The most alien races i have read about are probably H.P. Lovecraft's Great Old Ones, unfathomable intelects that operate in more dimensions than we can understand. they are often misrepresented as evil, but im sure their motivations are perfectly sane to them, we just cant understand them.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

March 25th, 2004, 05:15 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
How much of what we know as the fear emotion in ourselves is merely a biological and chemical reaction? What if we can demonstrate some day that our own "intelligence" is merely the result of an incredibly complicated set of chemical and biological reactions, as some people believe.
If we meet aliens some day, I will be less concerned with whether we can understand it and recognize it as intelligent, and more concerned with whether we can convince them that we are actually intelligent, and not merely doing a very good "impression". 
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

March 25th, 2004, 05:26 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
okay, a quick web search reveals that it goes CLASS > ORDER > FAMILY > GENUS > SPECIES
where class is things like insect or mamal, which is probably what we have five of and you say there are 15 more. I believe there is something above class with three enteries, Plant, Animal, or Fungus.
actually, on further reading it seems that class is far mor specific, containing things like insect, crustation, molusk, arachnid. maybe its not more specific, but there are more things in that Category than i gave credit for.
AH! more reading brings back the old memories! Kingdom and Phylum are the higher level categores, kingdom being Animal, Plant, or Fungi. Phylum is probably what we are talking about, being a much broader classification than Class.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

March 25th, 2004, 05:34 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
my god, theres certainly more than 5 Phylum. The vast majority of them are worms various kinds of worms of dubious distinction, while snails, clams, squids, and octopi all get lumped together as mollusks. is there really all that much setting those worms apart?
should we come up with a new clasification method based on DNA, rather than whaever observational methods we were using when we developed the current method? Id wager its at least a hundred years old, possibly two or three.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

March 25th, 2004, 05:36 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
I'm pretty sure there are a number of microscopic squidgies that fit into none of the above, kind of the way a duck billed platypus doesn't sit happily as either mammal, bird or reptile. I think amoebas and protozoa are somewhere between fungus and animal, for instance. Bacteria and virii might be others. It's a long time since i had to know these things...
|

March 25th, 2004, 05:38 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Alien, I mean really Alien.
hey, mollusk seems to exist at both the class and phylum level, what gives? thats what i get for using the Internet as a source of information...
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|