|
|
|
 |

April 28th, 2004, 02:43 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Welcome aboard, Joachim!
Then, concerning atmosphere and tech, how about this: (1) 2 atmospheres per team and high tech cost or (2) 1 atmosphere per team and medium tech cost?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

April 28th, 2004, 03:01 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
I have no preferences either way, so I'll cast my vote with my Admiral.
|

April 28th, 2004, 04:04 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
Welcome aboard, Joachim!
Then, concerning atmosphere and tech, how about this: (1) 2 atmospheres per team and high tech cost or (2) 1 atmosphere per team and medium tech cost?
|
I vote for option (2), just for the sake of minimizing micromanagement.
|

April 29th, 2004, 02:55 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
I have no preference. What ever the Commander & Chief prefers.
__________________
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, BUT Laziness Always Pays Off Now.
|

April 29th, 2004, 04:35 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
I think Spoon and Electrum have a good idea. Let's leave it up to the Commanders.
So far we have:
Turn Times: 48 hours till turn 15 (then 72 hours)
Map: Large (to be set up fairly by an approved non-player dividing teams across the map)
Type: To be decided
Racial restrictions: 2,000 points; 1 good starting planet; Low tech cost; No trait will be lowered to show "non-existant"; No Religious
Game restrictions: No mines; No intel; All players on a team must take the same colony type but a DIFFERENT atmosphere; surrender/gifts/trades/(etc.) allowed
Currently in question are atmospheres and tech cost.
As others, I will agree with what my commander prefers.
Yes, I know the setup of this game is taking a while but it is entirely possible, as in a 2 x 2 team game, that one team will finish in places 1 - 4 and the other will finish in places 5- 8...meaning quite a few points for the persons on the top and bottom.
This ISN'T a game where you made a treaty with a person halfway through the game and can dispose of them if they fall way behind...this is a game of what people believe to be the best (available) players in the Ratings system and will (most likely) combine the ability of each as a single player with their ability to contribute to the goal of the whole team.
So, Asmala and RexTorres...what are your thoughts on settings?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

April 29th, 2004, 06:47 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 364
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
I would add no Ancient trait.
I would propose 1 colony type and 1 atmosphere per side. No one can take the "none" atmosphere type.
|

April 29th, 2004, 06:52 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Rated Game Proposal
Quote:
Originally posted by rextorres:
I would add no Ancient trait.
I would propose 1 colony type and 1 atmosphere per side. No one can take the "none" atmosphere type.
|
Sounds like a fair proposal! As to Ancient, I must have missed it (when I proposed the game) because I think the game would be better without it.
So, Rex, any opinions on tech cost?
(I'm off to bed)
Asmala? Counter comments?
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|