|
|
|
 |

March 31st, 2001, 02:33 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
Ok, that's just plain nasty putting point defense on fighters... you sick little monkey.
quote: Originally posted by Nitram Draw:
Can you put PD on fighters?
------------------
Regards,
KiloOhm
__________________
Regards,
KiloOhm
|

March 31st, 2001, 02:53 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
Hey whats wrong with a little air superiority 
|

March 30th, 2001, 04:24 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
In my mod, I went with splitting PD into two techs.
1) PDCs - same as before, but range reduced by 50% or so & limited at 3. This means that the PDC is only gonna protect you, and maybe the guy right beside you.
2) PDLasers - long range, up to 7, but damage reduced to 50%. These guys can protect your entire fleet, but you need a LOT.
So, what you have is a tradeoff, either take PD that defends you well, or take PD that defends the entire fleet, but not as effetively
__________________
Things you want:
|

March 30th, 2001, 05:12 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
Thats what I like. No one component is the answer you need the right mix.
|

March 30th, 2001, 06:11 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sherman, TX, USA
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
I disagree. I think that the PD's are fairly balanced. Maybe a slight increase in missile speed is warranted. What I like is the external missile pod (ala David Webb's Honor series) component. It is a one shot deal in combat because it has a reload rate of 30, but it only takes up 1 space (10KT). Usually I Put these on smaller ships with some continuous weapon like a DUC or MB, or APB. I now get one shot to overload the PDs. Add a mix of missile ships with normal 3 reload missiles and I have an effective mix. One turn of massed fire to overload the PDs, then a mix of missiles and continuous fire. I think this balances out very well.
|

March 30th, 2001, 06:35 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
Now that sounds like a cool idea. Have you posted it? Are there other changes?
quote: Originally posted by suicide_junkie:
In my mod, I went with splitting PD into two techs.
1) PDCs - same as before, but range reduced by 50% or so & limited at 3. This means that the PDC is only gonna protect you, and maybe the guy right beside you.
2) PDLasers - long range, up to 7, but damage reduced to 50%. These guys can protect your entire fleet, but you need a LOT.
So, what you have is a tradeoff, either take PD that defends you well, or take PD that defends the entire fleet, but not as effetively
------------------
Regards,
KiloOhm
__________________
Regards,
KiloOhm
|

March 30th, 2001, 06:41 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Point Def. too tough against missiles-change it.
I still think the biggest problem is with the accuracy of both PD and missles. If they both were about half as accurate as they are now I think it would reduce a lot of the complaints.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|