what about castles

[st.patrik]

Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
IMHO Id like to the more variety in the pros and cons of the castles to allow for more variety in tactics. Just a couple examples...

If the mausoleum were 100 and a 2-day build then it would be quite useful strategically to races such as Ulm and Pangaea.

If the high end castles were long-build, high-cost, but had great admin/supply boosts it would be useful to races such as Man

I like the sound of this. right now the advantages of some of the higher end castles don't seem to outweigh the long build time and cost.

I would also like to see some more variety, like an expensive (in gold) castle that takes a while to build, but because of (relatively) low admin% etc. is really cheap from a design point perspective.

I also like the sound of different castles having different kinds of defense, but I think it's unlikely that we'll see that. But for whatever it's worth, it would get my vote.

[ October 07, 2003, 18:51: Message edited by: st.patrik ]