|
|
|
 |

October 14th, 2003, 04:09 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Quote:
Originally posted by Maelstorm:
Reading Johan Osterman's reply.....I had a feeling that the Dominions 2. AI will suck balls once again.
On the old shrapnel's Dom 2. site there was a sentence that Doms 2. will have a very good AI.
On the new site this info cannot be found.
I think that Shrapnel realized that the AI will suck, so they removed that sentence, because lying is not wise for a publisher.
I tell you, that one of the most imprtant thing is the AI in a strategy game, if the game is not a MMORPG. You should think about this.
|
You could actualy find out about things before posting something half-assed like this.
You haven't touched the game, betatesters and Shrapnel-dudes say the AI is good, i trust betatesters and Shrapnel-dudes, i can't understand why saying that AI has been improved makes you think that the AI will "suck balls".
I also wonder if you have played Dom I for more than 2 times...
[ October 14, 2003, 15:18: Message edited by: Nerfix ]
__________________

"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|

October 14th, 2003, 04:44 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 990
Thanks: 13
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Yes yes, we all know that Dom is designed first and formost from a MP point of view. We also understand the complexities involved in creating a 'suitable' AI (suitable is in the eye of the beholder of course) for a game with as many complex systems as Dom has.
However, one thing that Maelstrom said has at least some merit, the majority of play on Dom will be in SP mode, to ignore that market (not that Illwinter is ignoring it) would be sheer folly. If there are asperations for great sales of Dom2 then the SP game needs to be reinforced as being terrific. Look for all any of us knows it is, and hopefully once the community gets their hands on the game there will be alot of new ideas and discussions about the AI.
I will remain hopeful that Illwinter remains as faithful to their fan base as they've been with Dom1, and when and where they can they will make improvements to the AI to further improve the SP experience.
A Last resort is to move to heavilly scripted maps to give a challenge to SPers, however, thats not as good of a result as it is to be able to make continued improvements to the Dom AI.
|

October 14th, 2003, 05:52 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Sorry folks, I got a copy of DOM2.exe from a betatester, ran a disassembler on it, and managed to recreate the logical class structure. The results look bad. I'll post the source code of the AI class here:
/*Dominions 2 AI code*/
Class Dom2AI{
//primary AI command
int suck(MonkeyBalls *MB){
//Remember to fill this in by patch 1.3
return 2;
}
}
Well, there you have it. I don't want to draw any premature conclusions, but the only Dominions 2 AI function seems to be... shorter than I had hoped. Oh well...
-Cherry
P.S. I think the DOMI AI is pretty good. And for those of you who are extra sensitive today, the above is intended to be humorous
[ October 14, 2003, 17:17: Message edited by: Saber Cherry ]
|

October 14th, 2003, 06:08 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
ROTFLMAO!
I didn't know that function "suck monkey balls" does miracles...
Ok, but we still don't have a real answer about the targeting efficency...
__________________

"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|

October 14th, 2003, 06:11 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Quote:
Originally posted by Saber Cherry:
Sorry folks, I got a copy of DOM2.exe from a betatester, ran a disassembler on it, and managed to recreate the logical class structure. The results look bad. I'll post the source code of the AI class here:
/*Dominions 2 AI code*/
Class Dom2AI{
//primary AI command
int suck(MonkeyBalls *MB){
//Remember to fill this in by patch 1.3
return 2;
}
}
Well, there you have it. I don't want to draw any premature conclusions, but the only Dominions 2 AI function seems to be... shorter than I had hoped. Oh well...
-Cherry
|
You should stop posting your uber BS. You are making no sense usually.
I have a question: What is this histeria about the Dominions 2. AI? We dont even played with the game! 
[ October 14, 2003, 17:12: Message edited by: Zerger ]
|

October 14th, 2003, 06:27 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
We can say this or that about TW AI, but as far as the AIs go, it is good, maybe not at its brightest as the strategical one, but the tactical one is. Of course you can beat it, but you can fully control your own units there, so it's not really comparable to the game where you cannot do that. Even with tactical control, if you mod the game so that the strategical AI does not build droves of peasants, but rather some quality troops instead, it puts up a very decent challenge on hard and expert. Try autoresolving in MTW every time, and you'll see how you'll fare.
And why would you leave an undefended province when attacking anyway? 
|

October 14th, 2003, 06:39 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvink��, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Targeting efficiency
Zerger:
That is humor.
Now it has been proved that internet humor NEEDS the  or  smiley to be understood as humor or a joke. Sarcasm needs the [/sarcasm] tag to be understood as sarcasm.
Note:Even if this post has the  and  smileys and [/sarcasm] tag, this isn't humor, sarcasm, or a joke.
[ October 14, 2003, 17:39: Message edited by: Nerfix ]
__________________

"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|