|
|
|
 |
|

December 16th, 2003, 10:15 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
There's also Water Cult, but since it only helps sacred units it's not necessarily the best choice for Ulm...
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|

December 17th, 2003, 07:16 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
As YWL said, but IMHO didn't really emphasize enough, Golems suck against R'lyeh. Sure, it's immune to Mind BLast, but some Teleporting Starspawn will just spank you with Magic Duel, as a Golem only has Astral 2.
-Jasper
|

December 17th, 2003, 07:54 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
You can always equip the golem with Slave Collar... You need one blood, but you can hunt the slaves for empowerment even without any blood income or mages.
|

December 17th, 2003, 08:12 AM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by Endoperez:
You can always equip the golem with Slave Collar... You need one blood, but you can hunt the slaves for empowerment even without any blood income or mages.
|
why slave collar? It only boosts morale IIRC.
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|

December 17th, 2003, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
It makes the wearer feebleminded, not sure if that helps though. Does feeblemind make you lose all magic skills or just unable to cast spells?
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
|

December 17th, 2003, 04:27 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA, USA
Posts: 274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by Teraswaerto:
quote: Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
Most water units fight badly (if at all) on land.
|
I think illithids would disagree with this statement. Let them disagree with my longbow regiments. 
__________________
People do not like to be permanently transformed and would probably revolt against masters that tried to curse them with iron bodies.
Pigs, on the other hand, are not bothered, or at least they don't complain.
-- Dominions II spell manual
|

December 17th, 2003, 05:35 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 296
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by reverend:
great input!
hadn't really thought of constructs / golems. shows how much i still have to learn. (only got the game yesterday)
quote: Remember that any mage with a water magic skill can enter the water. If it has more than one water magic it can take another ait-breather (1 for each water point) with him.
|
does this include empowered spies? one scuba-diving scout should help determine where to attack with the rest of the army. the construct approach sounds good since i'm researching construction anyway, but i think i'll go with masses of shamblers. never really had a gold problem, and they cost only 1 resource per unit. should be enough to form the bridgehead. (or whatever they call it underwater )
and, yes, this is vs. AI. If you got enough water gems income, it's cheaper to empower *one* mage to Water one and have him forge "Ring of Water Breathing" (5 gems, Construction 2) or as another person said, Shambler Skin Armor (also 5 gems, Construction 2). There are other items to get you into the water but they're probably out of easy reach for Ulm.
|

December 17th, 2003, 06:53 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
This is not my experience at all! Illithids eat my Niefel Giants alive & the top Altantean heavy infantry are tough.
Quote:
Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
Most water units fight badly (if at all) on land. And land units tend to fight badly in water. What I tend to do is build an army that can go into the water (constructs, undead, shamblers, whatever) and when a water-capable set of mercs come up I let that decide my timing.
I try to take one out of the way spot so I can start building up WATER units there. Dont keep marching forward and spread yourself too thin. It works best to try and take water provinces with water units.
Remember that any mage with a water magic skill can enter the water. If it has more than one water magic it can take another ait-breather (1 for each water point) with him.
|
|

December 17th, 2003, 07:37 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: tactic vs underwater
Quote:
Originally posted by Joonie73:
This is not my experience at all! Illithids eat my Niefel Giants alive & the top Altantean heavy infantry are tough.
|
I understand that. Its why I put the word "most" into the statement.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|