|
|
|
 |

January 9th, 2004, 09:51 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In my minds\' eye
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
__________________
When there is no more room in Hell the dead will walk the Earth.
|

January 9th, 2004, 11:38 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
Quote:
Originally posted by gregarine:
The Computer Gaming World review was what got me to come here and order the game. They made the game sound very/deep and complex which is what I like!
|
Same here (CGW and the tutorial site).
|

January 10th, 2004, 12:01 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
I found the game to be extremely swift to figure out - at least in terms of the basics. I downloaded the demo, and (with particular gratitude to the between-turn tips) figured out most everything you need to play the game in a game or two.
Of course, the game is still springing surprises on me, but that's the sign of a well-made game. It's the same thing that kept Nethack going so long, really - easy to start, but there always seems to be more to discover.
|

January 10th, 2004, 12:39 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
At surface level, I thought the game was sorta like Risk when I first picked up [Dom1]. Reading Usenet, I saw people screaming about sick units and combinations (and of course, SC's); however, having been raised in an age where strong units in video games actually LOOK like strong units, it took me a while to get used to the understated-yet-still-quite-strong units in Dominions.
More complex than Dominions? Only a few roguelikes come to mind. And of course, they're all free.
|

January 10th, 2004, 04:13 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
|

January 10th, 2004, 04:38 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
Quote:
Originally posted by Griswel:
quote: Originally posted by gregarine:
The Computer Gaming World review was what got me to come here and order the game. They made the game sound very/deep and complex which is what I like!
|
Same here (CGW and the tutorial site). It was CGW battle report that cinched it for me. I just got the game and haven't got over the learning curve yet so I spend most of the time crouched in my little provinces, playing with magic and hoping none of the computers notice me.
__________________
Clinically Inept
The Eternal Newb
|

January 10th, 2004, 05:37 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bet the CGW review helped.
Quote:
Originally posted by Wauthan:
I guess Illwinter will add a step by step tutorial for Dominions 3: Fall of the Gods that explains its detailed and streamlined userinterface?
If it had not been for this forum, and particularly the works of Saber Cherry, I would simply have given up on the game and saved my money for Warlords Battlecry 3. Now I'm glad I didn't. This game is very addictive, and I eagerly await the patch. Learning the game is pretty fast actually. Mastering it enough to beat the computer on easy is a whole other matter.
|
It's funny you should mention that! I consider Warlords Battlecry II to be an exceptional game... on par with Kohan, if not Total Annihilation. And yet - I've been playing Dominions for a couple years, and am writing (to my knowledge) its only combat sim... and am still completely unfamiliar with most of the spells and 60% of the units
I think that's what I like about it. There are just too many variables to ever do anything "perfectly"... not because it is too hard... but because there is no "perfect way".
-Cherry
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|