Luck/Order scales after 2.06 Patch

[Graeme Dice]

Originally posted by Arryn:
You're assuming I need more. I can hire mages, or I can hire Jarls. The Jarls have been more useful in expanding. Try not to assume that the way you like to play is the way someone else does.

No, I'm simply stating the fact that 12 mages does not a significant force make. I'd like to have 12 mages just researching by turn 14-15 in most cases, and even then, that's only going to get you somewhere in the neighbourhood of 60 research points.

More assumptions. See above comments. As for positioning, there are spells that will reach out and hit you anywhere. Ditto for flying enemies.

If your enemy is casting spells that will affect the whole battlefield, and you are not supplying any magical firepower of your own, then I wish you luck in keeping your losses to a reasonable level. The only spells that can target mages specifically, and thereby are not affected by positioning as I already said, are magic duel and battlefield effects. Anything else can be avoided by being careful. If your enemy has fliers the mages them with a few heavy troops.

I personally find it more effective, in my games, to devote resources to reaching out and hitting the enemy than in defending myself.

What on Earth are you talking about? Putting mages on the battlefield has nothing to do with being on the defensive.

That's a nonsensical statement. Any strategy that works against a thinking opponent will work just as well against an AI

It makes sense if you think about it, rather than rush to judge someone else's play style.[/quote]

No, it really doesn't. You just claimed that a strategy that is effective in multiplayer is not necessarily going to be effective in single player.

The AIs aren't as challenging as a human, so you need not worry as much about them, nor how they will react to you. You will never need to worry about an AI using an 'innovative' strategy. You can take your time developing your nation as you see fit because you know that there isn't a human on the other side itching to take you down as fast as he can as a matter of his own pride. Et cetera. [/QB]

Which, of course, is you agreeing with me, and not at all what you originally stated.

[SurvivalistMerc]

If anyone else is still interested in this topic, just pretend that Jaspar's is the most recent topic-related post.

[PDF]

Back (more) on-topic :
I really have a problem with the "mix" between O/T and L/M : as it stands now you have to take Order to limit Misf effect, or to take Turmoil to amplify Luck. But Order is a rock hard good investment, whereas Luck is a gamble...

In the end you have a 0 net Design cost in both case, but with O+M have +20% income, +6% res and *very few* bad events, in the other you have -20%, -6%, and may have unpredictable good events...(BTW getting 100's of Militias is just a waste of upkeep gold, not really a good news !)

Who will be foolish enough to go for the second option ? Maybe for fun in SP, but no way in MP.
THAT'S the issue IMHO..

[apoger]

>I really have a problem with the "mix" between O/T and L/M : as it stands now you have to take Order to limit Misf effect, or to take Turmoil to amplify Luck.


I'm working on a mod that will take care of this (for those that want to use it).

It should be done shortly, however I still need to know if there are mod commands that affect magic scale. They are missing from the docs, and I'd like to know if they are part of the available tools. It's hard to do balancing when one scale can't be modified.

[ywl]

Originally posted by PDF:
Back (more) on-topic :
I really have a problem with the "mix" between O/T and L/M : as it stands now you have to take Order to limit Misf effect, or to take Turmoil to amplify Luck. But Order is a rock hard good investment, whereas Luck is a gamble...

In the end you have a 0 net Design cost in both case, but with O+M have +20% income, +6% res and *very few* bad events, in the other you have -20%, -6%, and may have unpredictable good events...(BTW getting 100's of Militias is just a waste of upkeep gold, not really a good news !)

Who will be foolish enough to go for the second option ? Maybe for fun in SP, but no way in MP.
THAT'S the issue IMHO..

Why can't you go for Order 0/Luck+3? You spend 120 nation points. But you get a moderate income, get insured from the major unluck events and have access to the occasional major luck events. The major boost from Cross-Breeding, Void-Gate and Transformation are not bad for some nations neither. Or you can go for Luck +1 or +2 using a lesser amount of points. Points are important but how else are you going to use it? Boosting up a combat pretender who might die frequently. It's always a balance of the overall design.

To me, Order+3/Luck-3 is usable but it is risky. You can get hit by something *very* nasty, even though the chance is smaller. And for some nations, you will definitely miss the heroes. Chao-3/Luck+3 is indeed stupid because of the disabling income. But it just show that negative scale is bad and you can't get something for nothing. It'll be more to my tastle if the effect of Order scale on random events decrease from +/-5% to +/-4%. But as what stands now, I don't think that it's such a no-brainer for Order+3/Luck-3.

[Catquiet]

Apoger,

For your mod I would suggest reducing Order to +/- 5% gold to balance it against all the other scales.

Giving Luck a +/- 2% gold effect would be a quick fix for that scale.


Kristoffer O, could you list all the population destroying events and the scales they require?

[SurvivalistMerc]

I wonder what folks would think about these effects:

Order: 6% income, -13% events per tick
Turmoil: -6% income, +13% events per tick

Luck: 1% income, +13% chance that event will be good per tick
Misfortune: -1% income, +13% chance that events will be bad per tick.

Order 3, Misfortune 3 would eliminate almost all random eents but only yeild 15% gold, and you wouldn't get the heroes.

Turmoil 3, Luck 3 would only be a 15% monetary loss, but you would have lots of luck, and 89% or almost all of them would be good.

Under Catquiet's scales, order3, misfortune 3 nets only 9% additional gold. And I assume you would still have 80% of events bad, normal numbers of events, and you don't get the heroes? That doesn't sound all that viable to me.

I still want them to let us mod the events. Because I want to make some really good events, like getting 20 units you would love to have in the late game rather than militia or flagellants. Some of the lucky events don't strike me as all that great right now, and I would like to fix that and go back to the pre-patch luck-order scales. But that's just me.