Two questions on preaching

[onomastikon]

Grr ok ... darn, I sort of *liked* the way Gen Tacticus explained it and felt I could deal with that. Anyone know how it works / how do you know Gen Tact isnt right?

I didnt realize sneaky searches would be hard to implement; wouldnt it be kind of easy for you to know "found site in XYZ" but the current owner wouldnt get that message and no one would get the gems?

[General Tacticus]

Oh, I'm sure he's right : he's one of the developpers of the game

And he looks grumpy!

[onomastikon]

J ostermann, you are / were on the dev team? wow ok thanks. So how can one go about figuring out how preaching works, or just sort of "ungefähr" how it works (um... "sort of" how it works, without the exact numbbers, but maybe just saying what factors x and y stand for?)

[johan osterman]

Originally posted by onomastikon:
J ostermann, you are / were on the dev team? wow ok thanks. So how can one go about figuring out how preaching works, or just sort of "ungefähr" how it works (um... "sort of" how it works, without the exact numbbers, but maybe just saying what factors x and y stand for?)

Well, kind of, most of the actual work is done by Kristoofer or Johan K. I do a little stuff occassionally though.

X is a value, 10 20 or 30 I think, y is a value, 20 or 30 IIRC.

[onomastikon]

thanks -- no I meant: not what number x and y be, but they are a variable standing for what "factor" (like is it: opposing dominion, number of temples, etc. etc.)?

[johan osterman]

Originally posted by onomastikon:
thanks -- no I meant: not what number x and y be, but they are a variable standing for what "factor" (like is it: opposing dominion, number of temples, etc. etc.)?

They are just arbitrary numbers. The x and y are constants, y is multiplied with the priest lvl. So x + y*(priest lvl) should be something like 20+20*2 = 60% for a 2lvl priest ie a 60% chance of the dominion increasing 1 step in the province where he preached.


Edit: Turns out there isn't any x involved. Just (priest lvl)*20.

[ January 18, 2004, 14:41: Message edited by: johan osterman ]