
January 25th, 2004, 12:24 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: still at loss in understanding this...
Quote:
Originally posted by Pocus:
they had hold and attack closest. In this case F, unless closest is determined initially and not recomputed, but I dont even want to take into account this stupid possibility.
|
You mean you don't believe the "closest" is determined at the start of the fight? It's pretty clear to me that it is for pure "Attack closest" orders, and I wouldn't be surprised if it were the case for "Hold and attack".
The orders system has very little flexibility; I'm perpetually amazed that some people manage to get a measure of control in their battles. I typically don't, unless I'm using long-range missile troops positioned at the end of the battlefield...
|