|
|
|
 |

January 31st, 2004, 09:36 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Well, here's the final settings for all you happy people.
Indy Strength, 6
Sites 50%
Events: Common
Hall: 15
Richness: normal'
Graphs: Off
Standard Victory
Wan, since you decided you wanted Abysia, we're slotting that to you.
So, Everyone needs to go ahead and create a pretender, and send me the file as an attachment. Go ahead and put your country name, and your name, in the title to help me sort them quickly from my mailbox.
Lear
MARKOOS at MAIL.UTEXAS.EDU
[ February 03, 2004, 22:09: Message edited by: King Lear ]
|

January 31st, 2004, 09:36 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
Oh, forgot to mention, we're doing Orania.
|

January 31st, 2004, 08:27 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
One Last thing: Passwording your pretender might not be a bad idea incase one day, amidst hectic classes, I accidently send a file to someone to whom it does not belong. In a game of stratagy such intelligence could be devestating.
Four are in, we're waiting on some more!
Lear
|

February 1st, 2004, 05:23 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
7 are in, just a few more =)
|

February 2nd, 2004, 07:59 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
ive sent what i hope is the correct file. lets get this baby rockin' 
|

February 2nd, 2004, 07:25 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 296
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
I've read that Caelum in 2.06 is bugged so that it preferred Heat+3 (economically?), which is incompatible with their troops.
Should the Caelum player check it out and we can apply Catquiet's mod, which patch it, if it's necessary?
Wan
|

February 2nd, 2004, 08:21 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Berlin
Posts: 300
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PBEM Multiplayer Game: No new positions (was "New Multiplayer Game")
That's true, but I certainly hope there'll be a patch coming along soon... I wouldn't mind the mod, but with Caelum, I am not in for a fast start anyway, and can afford to play two or three weeks or so (which should cover the first 10 turns) with an income offset.
Thanks for the consideration, though.
I like my Caelians hot and frying. 
__________________
Shut your mouth, it could open your mind! - from Skyclad's On With Their Heads!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|