|
|
|
 |

February 6th, 2004, 03:27 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
if you can only swim down river... how do you go backwards?..
How do you get back to where you want to be?
|

February 6th, 2004, 03:45 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The lurking depths...
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
I voted yes, if only because the ratio of sea :: land is kind of... well, bad, if you couldn't access the inland lakes.
__________________
Why hello there.
|

February 6th, 2004, 04:14 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
Quote:
Originally posted by Argitoth:
if you can only swim down river... how do you go backwards?..
How do you get back to where you want to be?
|
I don't think you can make one-way neighbors in Dominions II. If you can go from A to B, you can go from B to A.
|

February 6th, 2004, 07:01 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
Actually you can!
|

February 6th, 2004, 07:54 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
Quote:
Originally posted by Argitoth:
Actually you can!
|
Meh? That's not in the mapedit manual. That isn't even part of the editor. How's that work?
|

February 6th, 2004, 07:57 AM
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
[Bad Diagram of Impossibility Removed]
[ February 06, 2004, 07:19: Message edited by: Zen ]
|

February 6th, 2004, 08:45 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Should R\'lyeh and Atlantis swim upriver?
Well, according to the mapedit PDF, the #neighbour command says "Makes it possible to move between these two provinces in both directions". I was under the impression, therefore, that the single command set a symmetric link, and you didn't need two commands to set a link between two provinces.
This is further corroborated by looking at a map file, where there's only one #neighbour command linking a pair of provinces, with no second #neighbour command for the reverse link.
So by setting #neighbour A B, you've automatically set the reverse link, and the command #neighbour B A is redundant and does nothing whether it's there, or you remove it....
Am I missing something here?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|