|
|
|
 |

February 27th, 2004, 02:42 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AAR wanted for possible site publication
Quote:
Originally posted by Norfleet:
|
I always thought this was SUPPOSED to be an AAR, "after-action report". If you're making the report DURING the action, wouldn't it be a DAR, "during-action report"?
Heh, well I suppose technically if someone is doing it turn by turn it would still be an "after-action report" since it's a report done after that turn's actions.
-Scott
|

February 27th, 2004, 09:12 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: AAR wanted for possible site publication
I suppose technically the AAR we got at first over in the newsGroups were writeups after the game was done where the people talked about what they could remember of the game. It was "game journals" which were the ongoing stories. Here they seem to have merged
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|

March 10th, 2004, 04:26 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AAR wanted for possible site publication
Well, this was disappointing. After two weeks I've received ZERO responses. I guess everyone is too busy playing to write about it.
Oh well.
-Scott
|

March 12th, 2004, 03:09 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AAR wanted for possible site publication
Aye, and it usually takes (a lot) more than two weeks to play a normal MP game. Blitz games can be done quicker, but aren't the norm. I suspect they'd make for a somewhat irregular AAR, although not neccesarily an uninteresting one.
Another problem is that, given the length and complexity of an MP Dom2 game, some organization is probably needed to get it all the pieces together. Most MP games currently going were started before your announcement and thus the early stages were already a bit inaaccessable in terms of complete recording.
If you are still interested, possibly an MP game could be set-up specifically to be AAR fodder? The participants could e-mail a summary of each turn to a party trusted not to leak private info/plans to others, and then that data could be compiled later into a cohesive AAR.
|

March 12th, 2004, 06:37 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AAR wanted for possible site publication
Your typical PBEM-grade MP game takes weeks to finish. A blitz/marathon, on the other hand, is much too frenzied and by the end of the game, most of the players can't remember what happened on Turn X anyway.
|

March 12th, 2004, 07:48 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AAR wanted for possible site publication
Although I understand why a MP AAR would be quite good. The SP ones tweaked the interest for me - particularly Arryns fine Jort one - as a MP player I could see how the game would be amazing in MP.
I'd use that one personally
Tals
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|