I Love This Game

SurvivalistMerc · #1 March 2nd, 2004, 09:24 PM

I agree. Dom 2 is amazing. It's replayable with so many possible play styles and levels of difficulty that they are hard to count.

The diverse units, diverse magics, wondrous magical sites, strategic depth make Dom 2 a real gem.

It will be on my comp...probably until Dom 3 comes out. It replaced MoM as my favorite fantasy genre game, and that's hard to do.

vanedor · #2 March 2nd, 2004, 09:25 PM

"Of course you do. Anyone who says otherwise is a heretic and must be burned at the stake."

The syndrome of playing Marignon too much ?

Lord Hammer · #3 March 2nd, 2004, 09:30 PM

This game is simply a masterpiece, a symphony of mass murder and destruction!

And you guys...you know who you are...make it even better

. A great game with a greater group of talented people who make Dom 2 even better. I salute you!

PhilD · #4 March 2nd, 2004, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Saber Cherry:

quote:
Originally posted by Ctennyson:
I just want to let Johan and Kris et al how much I appreciate their effort.

Poor al, he doesn't get appreciated very often.

What do you mean, he doesn't get appreciated? He's the most often quoted scientist ever!

Aikamun · #5 March 3rd, 2004, 08:59 AM

Saber Cherry is not referring to Albert Einstein, but "...et AL..." from Ctennyson's original post.

This dwarf has never seen the "al" of Illwinter.
Aikamun

[ March 03, 2004, 07:02: Message edited by: Aikamun ]

PhilD · #6 March 3rd, 2004, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aikamun:
Saber Cherry is not referring to Albert Einstein, but "...et AL..." from Ctennyson's original post.

This dwarf has never seen the "al" of Illwinter.
Aikamun

So am I. It's a standing joke among scientists, that everybody keeps citing papers where this "al" is among the list of co-authors, in each and every field of science...

Gandalf Parker · #7 March 3rd, 2004, 04:02 PM

Standing jokes amoung scientists are a problem. I guess like standing jokes amoung any field. It either works, or the explanation is longer than its worth.

I keep making reference to AI meaning "almost implemented" which is in over half of any paper done on AI. (Its a reference to a long list of projects which were AI until they were implemented then they got new names taking them out of AI leaving only un-achieved projects still referred to.)

Or the Priests of Quantum (quantum chaos theory, 11 dimensions, strings and membranes, all of which moves the scientific theories of how everything began back into line with creationism)