|
|
|
 |

March 3rd, 2004, 05:11 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
Thanks for the reference to the EXCELLENT dominions.pdf document. I went off and read it and then realized that my question was not answered. When I returned to my post to state this I see that you have already editied your response with the answer!! Thanks!
__________________
Regards,
Nethog
|

March 3rd, 2004, 05:14 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: twilight zone
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
Quote:
Originally posted by Nethog:
Thanks for the reference to the EXCELLENT dominions.pdf document. I went off and read it and then realized that my question was not answered. When I returned to my post to state this I see that you have already editied your response with the answer!! Thanks!
|
hehe. You're quite welcome. I did a quick read of the doc and noticed it myself, hence the fast edit.
EDIT: I also put a link to the doc on my site's downloads page so I wouldn't have to go hunt it down via forum search again.
[ March 03, 2004, 15:16: Message edited by: Arryn ]
|

March 3rd, 2004, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Amerigo Vespucci's Land
Posts: 548
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
Thanks for pointing out the missing info in the dominion document - I'll edit it as soon as I get a chance. If you find anything else that should be included but isn't, just let me know.
|

March 3rd, 2004, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: twilight zone
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
Quote:
Originally posted by ceremony:
Thanks for pointing out the missing info in the dominion document - I'll edit it as soon as I get a chance. If you find anything else that should be included but isn't, just let me know.
|
No. Thank *you* for putting such a useful document together. Fine, fine work.
|

March 3rd, 2004, 08:14 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 114
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
An excellent document, although the game is called Dominions never quite appretiated that you could end up holding a province that wasn't necessarily your dominion, just printing it off now.
From my quick spin through am I right in saying there is no harm and in fact it would be good to set up a temple in each province?
Tals
|

March 3rd, 2004, 08:19 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
Other than the cost, no there's no harm at all.
|

March 3rd, 2004, 09:49 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: ConVersion Rates
For most nations, it's 200 gold a pop. That might be more useful in other ways, especially if you're not sure you can hold the province for that long. Depends on whether or not you're gold-starved.
With some setups, it might be worth NOT spreading your dominion everywhere, creating a weak/no-dominion zone with Stone Idols plus not building temples. You might do this if you want to locally escape negative aspects of your dominion, e.g. the mass death from AE/SG Ermor or CW Pangaea, or drain scale so your non-Master Smith researchers can get something done, or keeping your Miasma away from your Library and Sages.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|