|
|
|
 |

May 24th, 2004, 06:29 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Play The World
I'd rather get on with the game. I have no problem with this incident as it doesn't show cheating. Underhanded trickery maybe, but not cheating. If you don't want your plans getting out, don't tell anyone. This is the internet where everyone is anonymous. I'm not saying you deserved it, but in the land of anonymity, I tend to keep my secrets to myself. I also understand that certain people may not want to play with someone who would do this, that is fine too. I have no problem with that. But the fact is, he didn't cheat. Until I hear of actual cheating or discover through my own interaction with Norfleet that he is a cheater, then I'll give him the benefit of the doubt as far as manipulating the map. I won't trust him in game, but then again I don't really trust anyone. Once again, I say play on.
Vig
|

May 24th, 2004, 08:25 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Strasbourg, France
Posts: 170
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Play The World
I vote for keeping the game going. Do you guys really think that Norfleet cheated? I am sure that he can just let someone whom everyone else trusts just look at his game.
__________________
Wrath them 'till they glow, and arrow them in the dark.
|

May 24th, 2004, 09:20 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Play The World
If deliberately misleading players as to your identity, and using their trust to gain information to use against them in a game you are actually playing in isn't cheating...
...you live in a different world to mine.
Here's some steroids, Good luck in Athens.
|

May 24th, 2004, 09:31 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Play The World
I am glad that people see the Norfleet's behavior for what it worth.
Norfleet's excuses are laughable and he knows it of course. The issue is not that he had joined the game under alias and spoiled it, despite the fact that homerules were clearly created to prevent abusive norfleet's style of gameplay. It is not even than he had been deceived people on IRC channel throughout the game by listening to their plans against him without telling them so.
But the fact that he continuously and deliberately pumped his in-game neighbors for information about their plans and wars against his nation, while hiding ubder alias, is truly, as Tris said, sickable.
Than, when he was finally forced to "admit" that Pakhar is "Apprentice" of Norfleet, but claimed that Norfleet didn't give Pakhar any advice, he said on our Ice and Fire thread as a Pakhar:
Quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
Why in the world would Norfleet ask such questions from caelum's neigbors while hiding the fact that he knows Caelum's player and he is in fact his favorite purpil, if Norfleet would be just observing Pakhar performance?!?
|
Originally posted by Pakhar Njal:
I find that this [Norflett's] behavior is perfectly normal from him. He tends to be a rather keen spectator on events like this.
Keen observer, huh? Very keen indeed. And cheating and dishonorable as well.
P.S. to Cainhill: As for my rudeness to Norfleet, you know very well that I was always very polite to him on the IRC channel throughout our game. It's only on the Last day of "Ice and Fire" when he "admited" that he was deceiving us all along by telling that he didn't know Pakhar (he even asked us "Who is playing Caelum?" ), when in fact he was his "apprentice" and he "admited "that he was giving continious advice to Pakhar thorughout the game, while asking as about our plans about his nations, than I've snaped and said to him "STFU" when he kept interrupiting our discussion what to do in the game that he, as both Norfleet and Pakhar, have spoiled. Of course I was very pissed off at him at that point. Who wouldn't be?!?
What looks strange to me is that you have accursed me several times pub;ickly that it was my fault that I've admited "Norfleet's ringer" in our game. Now you are saying than you have know that Pkahar was Norfleet all along. I wished you would kept your facts straight instead of for some reason trying to protect Norfleet.
[ May 24, 2004, 20:39: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
|

May 24th, 2004, 09:34 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Play The World
Quote:
Originally posted by Tris:
If deliberately misleading players as to your identity, and using their trust to gain information to use against them in a game you are actually playing in isn't cheating...
...you live in a different world to mine.
Here's some steroids, Good luck in Athens.
|
He didn't cheat. If people were stupid enough to be giving him information, when they already had suspicions that it was him, that's as much their problem as his.
Frankly, if someone who supposedly isn't in a game I'm in starts asking questions about what I'm doing in the game, and what my plans are, I'm not going to be telling them.
All this is made more irritating by the nattering that was done on IRC about how they were setting up a fun game, no quitters, no players like Norfleet (given that they don't think playing against his strategy is much fun - I agree, but that's beside the point). I (and I believe archaeolept) was recruited with the belief that all players were personally recommended by someone - no unknowns, no ringers, no newbies.
But then they went and let in an unknown. Who, from what I understand, was just tickled to know that they didn't want him in the game, but hadn't bothered to tell him, and hadn't had the cojones to out and out say, "No Vampire Queens, no Norfleeting (my name for his tactic of a temple and castle on EVERY province), no Norfleet."
I was in that game, and was somewhat disappointed. By the game; by Norfleet, a little bit; but more, by some of the other people in the game and setting it up.
Again - he didn't cheat. If anything I'd say the concerted, out of game underhanded diplomacy to ally against one player / nation was closer to cheating, and was certainly unsporting.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

May 24th, 2004, 09:48 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Play The World
Quote:
Originally posted by Stormbinder:
I am glad that people see the Norfleet's behavour for what it worth.
Norfleet's excuses are laughable and he knows it of course. The issue is not that he joined the game under alias and spoiled it, despite the fact that homerules were clearly created to prevent norfleet's style of gameplay.
|
The homerules were clearly created to prevent Norfleet's style of gameplay???
Now I am going to "accurse" you of an intentional attempt to misrepresent the facts. Anyone who wants to can look on the GoneGold forum and check the homerules for the game.
Let me reread it.... Ah yes. #4, "Special Home Rule" - maximum of 10 clams to avoid clam hoarding. That's it. Hmmm. "Also, no Ermor in this game". And #1, "No newbies".
Let me see - just which home rule was created to prevent Norfleet's style of play? Which? Do tell. Or, to quote yourself - STFU.
Quote:
What looks strange to me is that you have accursed me several times pub;ickly that it was my fault that I've admited "Norfleet's ringer" in our game. Now you are saying than you have know that Pkahar was Norfleet all along. I wished you would kept your facts straight instead of for some reason trying to protect Norfleet.
|
No, I don't believe I said I knew it all along. It wasn't until sometime after turn 20 that I knew. You know - after the "blitz" that you took _25_ minutes to take the first turn in, starting at turn 10.
Protect Norfleet? I was irritated with him - even if the Secret Treehouse Club hasn't explicitly written on the door of the treehouse, "No Norfleet / No Gurlz Allowed", why would an adult go out of his way to sneak in in disguise just to pee on the pillows?
But tell me - when it's your pool party, and one of the guests you invited, pees in the pool, is it my job to clean it up? I don't think so.
And again - tell us which of those bloody home rules you _JUST_ said were designed to prevent Norfleeting, was meant to prevent Norfleeting? Nothing about VQs. Nothing about Norfleet. Nothing about castle-spamming.
Which was it, again?
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

May 24th, 2004, 09:50 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Play The World
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
He didn't cheat. If people were stupid enough to be giving him information, when they already had suspicions that it was him, that's as much their problem as his.
|
Of course he did cheat. Nobody was suspicious of him until late game. After that nobody was giving him any information or answering his questions. But by that time it was way too late, since he have crashed 2 out of 3 of his neigbors and they went AI.
I don't know why you are trying to distort the events and protect Norfleet Cainhill. Especially considering the fact that you were the only one who knew about Norfleet but didn't bother to tell us about than, instead accursing me of letting "Norfleet's ringer", as you put it, into our game. In any case please stop, I am not interested in arguing with you.
I encourage anyody who have any doubts about Norfleet's role in that game to fo to "Fire and Ice thread" and see for himself the true story, as well as all players reactions as the game was developing. Norfleet's (Pakhar's) words and actions speak for itself.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|