|
|
|
|
 |
May 21st, 2004, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
Thanks. Havent looked at it yet. Will it eventually be able to recreate the scoreboard that is inside the game showing progression? Or something like a slideshow of pie-charts smoothly going from one to the next showing how leadership has shifted.
This is one of the things that were asked for in the "3rd Party apps wishlist" if you want any more projects http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...=001628#000000 
[ May 21, 2004, 13:20: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ]
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
May 21st, 2004, 04:14 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
Yes, it has the score graphs like in the game. You can do them for a stat across 1 or more games and for multiple stats on 1 game. The graphs don't look quite as sharp as in DOM2, but it is only using MSChart. Other options may be added if I there seems to be an interest in them, and if I have the time.
|
May 21st, 2004, 04:32 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
This could be run for hundreds of games which have just computer opponents. Then a list could be calculated to show which nations the computer opponents play the best.
I bet Ermor is on top.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
May 22nd, 2004, 09:28 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,463
Thanks: 25
Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
Ermor is on top so we usually made tests without Ermor.
Who do you think was the most successful AI at normal settings (without Ermor that is)?
[ May 22, 2004, 08:29: Message edited by: Kristoffer O ]
|
May 23rd, 2004, 01:27 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
Bad one. It might be something that can kill lots of light infantries, but that would lose versus heavy infantry armies... And undead fare quite well versus light infantries if there are no priests.
I'll say C'tis.
|
May 23rd, 2004, 01:48 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 402
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
Ulm always does very well in my SP games.
|
May 23rd, 2004, 01:50 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Italy
Posts: 839
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Game Statistics Manager Utility
Well AI don't build forts!!!
__________________
- Cohen
- The Paladin of the Lost Causes
- The Prophet of the National Armyes
- The Enemy of the SC and all the overpowered and unbalanced things.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode