Vanheim Pretenders: Allfather and Asynya

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
A couple of death 2-3 mages have a good chance of killing her with raise skeletons as she doesn't have 0 encumbrance.

Slapping on a quick reinvigorator is enough to cure that problem, or Summon Earthpower, or any other light-reinvigoration options: The chassis, while not 0 encumberace, is fairly low-enc and has manageable fatigue with a few inexpensive items.

She also is vulnerable to windride.

Nothing a Robe of Etherealness or Wraith Crown can't fix. They're available earlier than Wind Ride is.

Her mistform will be defeated with only a few points of damage as well due to her low base hitpoints.

True, if you have something there that can hit hard enough to punch through mistform, but it's not like the VQ doesn't have the same problem.

My point isn't that the Virtue is one of the top-of-the-line SCs, but that despite her seemingly low stats, she can pull the job off adequately early game where it counts....and you can't argue with Wrathful Sky's effectiveness as a damage shield!

[ June 04, 2004, 20:09: Message edited by: Norfleet ]

[Nagot Gick Fel]

Originally posted by Norfleet:
My point isn't that the Virtue is one of the top-of-the-line SCs, but that despite her seemingly low stats, she can pull the job off adequately early game where it counts....and you can't argue with Wrathful Sky's effectiveness as a damage shield!

I concur. Thanks to low-level spells like Air Shield, Mirror Image and Shockwave I've found the Virtue to be a very effective territory grabber in the early game. And thanks to her high dominion base her hit points are usually more like 52 or above when she's ready to move. You just have to remember that at some point her role as a pocket SC will have to end, hopefully when that happens she'll have some big devastating battlespells in her grimoire.

[ June 04, 2004, 22:44: Message edited by: Nagot Gick Fel ]

[PvK]

Originally posted by atul:

quote:

---

Originally posted by PvK:
You people and your "(almost/quite/utterly) useless)" really need to find another adjective! You just mean "risky" or "sub-optimal because there are things with other qualities that I prefer", or are wrong, more often than not.

Oops, what have I done. I hereby duck and cover behind the excuse that my country has only two official Languages (Finnish and Swedish) to explain my lack of vocabulary. As an evidence I present you the fact that I've never asked what "Något gick fel" means. Rereading my earlier post I indeed did a mistake of using the phrase 'useless' in the final paragraph, which was not my intent. But my hope lays in the fact that it might be evident from my earlier text that I meant more like 'to be used with caution, keep away from too tight places and children under age 6'.
...

---

Sorry atul! Non-native English speakers are excused. "Useless" means "without any use" in English. Some native English speakers have been exaggerating and using "useless" when they mean something like "not the best" or "is not something I'd choose".

PvK