|
|
|
 |

June 10th, 2004, 10:12 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
If memory serves, the Prince of Death already had some notoriety as an early expansion weapon for Ulm as a zero-enc commander with good combat stats. PoD + full plate is good early, could add a better weapon (Rod of Death was strength-not-added, not too impressive; even a Sword of Sharpness would arguably be better for a physically strong pretender against ordinary troops) if you like.
Without native astral, nature, or death, but with the usual dominion rules; hm. Note that you'd only need to empower -one- blood-2 mage to blood-3 and then give him a dwarven hammer to crank out brazen vessels, athames, even armor of souls if need be, and you wouldn't need to divert slaves to maintain or expand dominion. Mictlan would have easier Crossbreeding, 'tho, for rapid reinforcement. Intriguing. If I wanted a Blood nation, I'd probably prefer this Version for the drastically reduced micromanagement (until Illwinter adds a 'sacrificers don't pool slaves' or equivalent rule, that is).
Heroes might need tweaking, but I can't remember them except for Orokestes.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|

June 10th, 2004, 11:04 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
Quote:
Originally posted by Taqwus:
If memory serves, the Prince of Death already had some notoriety as an early expansion weapon for Ulm as a zero-enc commander with good combat stats. PoD + full plate is good early, could add a better weapon (Rod of Death was strength-not-added, not too impressive; even a Sword of Sharpness would arguably be better for a physically strong pretender against ordinary troops) if you like.
|
True. However, before this the PoD has been completely overshadowed by the VQ. I'm simply concerned that the balance tipped too far the other way.
Quote:
Without native astral, nature, or death, but with the usual dominion rules; hm. Note that you'd only need to empower -one- blood-2 mage to blood-3 and then give him a dwarven hammer to crank out brazen vessels, athames, even armor of souls if need be, and you wouldn't need to divert slaves to maintain or expand dominion.
|
If you have the Earth gems. Granted, this mod would have Bloodstones, but every Bloodstone could be a Vessel/Knife. You're also just tantalizingly out of reach of Earth-5 for Forge.
Quote:
Mictlan would have easier Crossbreeding, 'tho, for rapid reinforcement. Intriguing. If I wanted a Blood nation, I'd probably prefer this Version for the drastically reduced micromanagement
|
s/easier// The funniest thing about the various Elemental Demons is that they generally don't work very together. The Storm Demons can easily kill the others with friendly fire, the Frost Fiends and the Devils don't work well together... the best combination are Demon Knights and Devils, but then you miss out on missile troops...
I sort of made this to test out various things, but I guess it does cut down on the micromanagement.
Quote:
Heroes might need tweaking, but I can't remember them except for Orokestes.
|
Orokestes would be even better for the mod than he would for the base. As a general rule, I simply remove Heroes from mods, just to avoid confusion.
Scott
__________________
Scott Hebert
Gaming Aficionado
Modding Beginner
|

June 10th, 2004, 11:34 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
Quote:
Originally posted by Bayushi Tasogare:
True. However, before this the PoD has been completely overshadowed by the VQ. I'm simply concerned that the balance tipped too far the other way.
|
That's usually the case when a knee-jerk reaction occurs as a result of a public outcry of whining. This is why I feel that whenever somebody calls for a nerfing of anything, that somebody should generally be ignored. Now the VQ is a more or less completely unusable chassis by any nation that doesn't have a huge number of points to burn...and isn't available to the most noteworthy, and perhaps appropriate, of them: Ermor. Meanwhile, other options are no more attractive than they were before. Instead of more and better options, we have less. To top that off, the new patch didn't really give us anything new, contentwise. Bleh.
|

June 10th, 2004, 11:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
Quote:
Originally posted by Norfleet:
Now the VQ is a more or less completely unusable chassis by any nation that doesn't have a huge number of points to burn...
|
She is still a perfectly useful combat pretender. She can't be easily turned into both a rainbow mage and a SC anymore, but that's not a bad thing.
Quote:
and isn't available to the most noteworthy, and perhaps appropriate, of them: Ermor.
|
I'm sure you must have meant to say the least appropriate here. She might be undead, but vampires don't fit in a land with no living humans.
Quote:
[QB]To top that off, the new patch didn't really give us anything new, contentwise. Bleh.
|
We got three very nice new units for desert tombs and a very nice boost to existing ones for Pangaea. Carrion woods got a good boost as well.
|

June 11th, 2004, 12:04 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
On the VQ issue, I fall more in line with Norfleet: there's actually very little reason to use the VQ now. And trying to argue that an Undead Pretender is non-thematic for Ermor is really pushing it. After all, you DO have Broken Empire as the base. (OTOH, BF Ulm is the most thematic for a VQ, not Ermor.) What irritates me about the VQ is that it was ONLY removed from Ermor, and that's too much a silver bullet.
Basically, the VQ changes, in the main, were aimed at the way Norfleet (and only Norfleet) plays. With all of the changes that were made to the VQ, it was totally unnecessary to remove it from Ermor as well.
Now, having said that, I disagree with Norfleet's comment that 'no useful content' was added in the patch. Desert Tombs became much more viable with this, and Pangaea is much more robust with their Revelers. I think this is a situation where both sides are overstating their cases.
I'm going to be trying to find a 'better balance' with everything through the modding. If I find anything that seems to lead to better games in the main, I'll be sure to post it. Since I play SP, my mods will be balanced for SP... which IMO should be the focus for modding, anyway, since MP is more complex to do, requires the acquiescence of the players involved, and is the focus for the developers anyway.
Scott
__________________
Scott Hebert
Gaming Aficionado
Modding Beginner
|

June 11th, 2004, 12:57 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
Seems to me that VQ doesn't make much sense for Ermor to have thematically (as well as for balance reasons) because with a killer dominion, the prospects for good blood drinking are few.
VQ seemed to have too little cost for all the abilities she had, compared to other gods. The patch increased her costs, without reducing her abilities. So she wasn't nerfed, so much as given an appropriate price tag.
Seems all good to me.
Other changes also include new abilities and tweaked values. Pangaea and Desert Tombs players got some new goodies.
PvK
|

June 11th, 2004, 01:12 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: PoD vs. VQ vs. Liches (was: Blood Arco mod)
Quote:
Originally posted by Bayushi Tasogare:
On the VQ issue, I fall more in line with Norfleet: there's actually very little reason to use the VQ now.
|
Is there any reason why we shouldn't read that an overstatement from the perspective of a narrow selection process? She's still a good immortal fighting chassis with a huge list of build-in abilities. Looks good to me.
Quote:
And trying to argue that an Undead Pretender is non-thematic for Ermor is really pushing it. After all, you DO have Broken Empire as the base.
|
Good point about Broken Empire, but they'd have to change the god selection UI to eliminate it only from the Ashen and SG themes. Seems to me there are good thematic and logical reasons from taking from them, and the perhaps unnecessary hit to Broken Empire doesn't seem to me like a big deal.
Personally, I'd rather have an unclear reason for an omitted pretender choice, than a couple of pretender choices that don't make a lot of sense (vampire queen with murderous dominion exterminating her blood sources).
Quote:
Basically, the VQ changes, in the main, were aimed at the way Norfleet (and only Norfleet) plays.
|
Oh? What about the chorus of whines that everyone was copying Norfleet's strategy?
Quote:
I'm going to be trying to find a 'better balance' with everything through the modding. If I find anything that seems to lead to better games in the main, I'll be sure to post it. ...
|
Cool - looking forward to it!
PvK
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|