|
|
|
 |

July 8th, 2004, 03:37 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The 1 guy alone in the back no retreat strategy ...
This does not seem like an exploit to me, since there are pros and cons.
The con would also be: a single militia may rout without being hit at all when he just sees the enemy coming (I am sure you have seen this happen). Also, a single militia is also still easier to wound or frighten than a group of militia.
Similarly, a group of militia may actually slow down incoming enemy troops at least long enough for them to get killed; and if they rout, the enemy will usually follow them and try to kill them all. A single militia will just get mowed down and that's the end of him, and will not even slow down a group of approaching infantry or cavalry at all.
Remember, a commander can have only 5 squads max, so you cannot infinitely spread out your troops anyhow.
I think that spreading out troops is not an "exploit" which need be addressed.
|

July 8th, 2004, 06:08 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 309
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The 1 guy alone in the back no retreat strategy ...
If there is a problem here, I think it is that it is so easy to use small Groups of weak units as decoys. What I want, in this situation, is for my troops to ignore the individual militamen sprinkled about the battlefield and go for the mages that are actually hurting them. If my men would kill the mages instead of wandering from one clump of miltia to the next, then who cares if the militia keep the mages from routing?
|

July 8th, 2004, 06:21 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The 1 guy alone in the back no retreat strategy ...
Yes, I think the actual issue is with some of the AI decisions, mainly Fire Closest firing 30 missile attacks at one crippled slave.
I think spreading up the light units is a valid tactic - it's just that in some ways the AI's response is too simple, inefficient and predictable. As Gandalf said, it makes sense to be able to create decoys - the replay reveals the ruse, but the men on the field don't have such an omniscient perspective, and at a distance can't always tell Sir Supertough apart from Ugh the crippled slave with a costume on.
I don't think routing should be increased, though. Wizards in particular would appreciate the value of an intact diVersion. If anything, I'd suggest tweaking the AI so it attacks a bit more judiciously in the problem cases (taking target unit size/strength into account a bit more, such as distributing missile fire better amongst the available targets, rather than concentrating everyone on the one closest unit).
PvK
|

July 8th, 2004, 07:20 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The 1 guy alone in the back no retreat strategy ...
Quote:
Originally posted by Cohen:
These forces are so minimal and insignificant that seems me an exploit of the fact the commanders won't retreat if there's a troop platoon in the battlefield.
|
This isn't an exploit: This is a fix for an obnoxious behavior where commanders, your *ACTUAL* fighting force, automatically retreat without any regard for morale when your decoy and distractionary force dies. Fix the first behavior, and the second behavior will immediately cease, since it serves no other purpose.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|