|
|
|
 |

June 2nd, 2001, 02:20 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Porto Portugal
Posts: 163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
New Intel op : counter insurgency
Used in planets that are rioting, have a probability of reducing the level of animosity.
On a diferent topic, if i stack wormholes (with warp maker/closer) is much easy to defend a system, because can concentrate defenses in one point (sats / mines / def stations).
Also, the system shield that stop build of nebula / black holes, stop star destroy ?
|

June 2nd, 2001, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 817
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
Crazy,
I am sorry but I do not understand your question.
|

June 2nd, 2001, 03:04 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
quote: If i build a ship that have minelayer capability / large cargo / shipyard , is possible to
add a flag for that shipyard only build mines ?
If i build a ship that have satlayer capability / large cargo / shipyard , is possible to
add a flag for that shipyard only build satellites ?
I think you can already do this with "One turn's worth" plus "Repeat Build", though you'd have to use "Hold Queue" whenever you wanted to move the ship.
------------------
Cap'n Q
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the
human mind to correlate all of its contents. We live on a placid
island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was
not meant that we should go far. -- HP Lovecraft, "The Call of Cthulhu"
[This message has been edited by capnq (edited 02 June 2001).]
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|

June 2nd, 2001, 04:47 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Porto Portugal
Posts: 163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
I refer to the system grav. shield facility.
It stop the nebula BH creation in a system.
My question is : stop also the destroying of a sun ?
|

June 3rd, 2001, 12:28 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Porto Portugal
Posts: 163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
The Pyrochette need more names for ships.
In a long game, i enconter ships up to 'Design 2380'.
|

June 3rd, 2001, 01:49 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
I've never gained any tech from capturing a planet. Even when they had level 3 buildings and I still had level 1. Perhaps there should be a command to scrap a facility and get tech from it like with ships.
Nice list, btw, Crazy.
|

June 3rd, 2001, 08:39 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oh, I\'m out there
Posts: 805
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New ideias / concepts / problems in / for SE4 (1.35):
It would be cool if when you captured a planet you gained tech (random) and your enemy lost a tech or two.
Imagine: After a long and devestating war in which numerous planets were captured or destroyed you find that, uh oh, you've lost about half you tech and will have to research it all over agian, would make for very interesting games.
------------------
Captain, I found your pants.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|