|
|
|
 |
|

August 14th, 2004, 02:12 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
My vote is for indy 3 because we already know who our enemies already are so we can fight them once we see them.
Two teams want to go at it as soon as possible and indy 3 will fill this nicely.
|

August 14th, 2004, 02:15 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
Also about the nation selection. It may be best with two captains taking turns choosing nations that way each team can try to form a theme they want or balance out their teams playstyle.
|

August 14th, 2004, 02:51 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
k, two teams then!
in order to speed up the process (if it wasn't moving fast enough already) I'd suggest having a third-party select random races for each player. Then if players don't like the race they've been randomly assigned, they can trade with their teammates. This will get the ball rolling for game hosting and start the converstations between team members reguarding playstyles and experience.
I'm all for creating "themed" teams, but we might be here till next week figuring out, post by post, what races to pick that complement our team (especially since we probably aren't experts with all the races). I personally am looking forward to playing a new race. My only request is that we decide the races soon, and then give a day to research/experiment first before uploading a pretender (so our choices are smart ones).
|

August 14th, 2004, 03:24 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 266
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
Quote:
k, two teams then!
in order to speed up the process (if it wasn't moving fast enough already) I'd suggest having a third-party select random races for each player. Then if players don't like the race they've been randomly assigned, they can trade with their teammates. This will get the ball rolling for game hosting and start the converstations between team members reguarding playstyles and experience.
I'm all for creating "themed" teams, but we might be here till next week figuring out, post by post, what races to pick that complement our team (especially since we probably aren't experts with all the races). I personally am looking forward to playing a new race. My only request is that we decide the races soon, and then give a day to research/experiment first before uploading a pretender (so our choices are smart ones).
|
Yeah 2 teams for the reasons the Panther noted.
Random allocation to player was not an option - random allocation to teams looks favourite on current voting followed by intra team haggling.
I am just not in that much of a hurry to start to need to rush things. I will give it until about 12.00 GMT tomorrow to allow those people who posted in the middle of my night a chance to comment then we can probably set the thing up. Still seem pretty precipitous to me & there is still no rush to start until everyone is happy with their nation & pretender.
Pickles
|

August 14th, 2004, 03:31 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 266
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Voting so far
Indeps Nations Graphs
Pickles 7 R Y
Aku 3 C -
Boron 7 C Y
Panther 3 R Y
Tauren 3 R -
????
Agrajag 7 R Y
Alexti 7 R Y
Cheezeninja3 R -
Yvelina
Lex 3 R -
Tuidjy?
Nations c= choose R = random
Here is how I believe everyone thinks - means has not expressed an opinion but has posted.
Until the others reply we cannot be sure but it looks like Random nations & graphs with indeps still to be decided. I give em 15 more hours or so.
(note I have come off the fence)
Pickles
|

August 14th, 2004, 04:01 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Voting so far
I prefer 2 sets of nations to be defined by a neutral party.Then each team distributing the nations between its players as it sees fit. Graphs are ok, considering that with only 2 teams they won't cause any usual problems. Not sure if indy strength will make much difference, though I probably prefer 6 or 7.
|

August 14th, 2004, 09:18 PM
|
|
Re: Voting so far
This game books pretty cool, but I think I'm in one too many, already (esp.as large alliances generate a lot of work)
One comment; you might want to think about the balance effect of UlM. It could easily turn into a magic item factory fed by all the gems five allies can send it. Protected by its allies, and allowed to concentrate on alchemy and forging exclusively Ulm could become very gross, and massively boost the side that gets it. I don't think any of tho other races would synergise with alliance play in quite the same way.
Mark
|

August 14th, 2004, 09:08 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
Quote:
Lex said:
My only request is that we decide the races soon, and then give a day to research/experiment first before uploading a pretender (so our choices are smart ones).
|
I could not agree more with this comment, as I for sure will take a race I have yet to play on MP no matter what method we use to decide races.
|

August 14th, 2004, 03:39 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 266
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
Quote:
My vote is for indy 3 because we already know who our enemies already are so we can fight them once we see them.
Two teams want to go at it as soon as possible and indy 3 will fill this nicely.
|
I think Indep 3 will actually have the opposite effect as you will feel compelled to get them all.
But we will see - well we will see how one indep strength works out.
12 players is more than I really wanted & will surely be unwieldy but we will see how it all plays. I think if I do this again I would make sure I had arranged one team in toto then challenge people to get together another team.
hmm irrelevant musing
wibble
Pickles
|

August 14th, 2004, 06:40 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: MP game - \"Pantheons\" Preliminary invite
Quote:
12 players is more than I really wanted & will surely be unwieldy but we will see how it all plays. I think if I do this again I would make sure I had arranged one team in toto then challenge people to get together another team.
|
Hehe, I didn't expect so many people as well =P
And if you intend to make another team game, try and invite me please ^^
Im going to sleep now, the only problem is I know that I probably won't have the computer for myself until sometimes late tomorrow...
I'll see how things unfold =P
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|