OT - US Presidential Candiates Arrested!

[Gandalf Parker]

England was trying to "civilize" the world NOT liberate it, the countries they conquered they occupied and established as tax paying provinces (AND DON'T EVEN CLAIM THE US HAS PROVINCES OR I WILL BEAT YOU WITH A STICK ) and not simply trade partners.

By the way... as far as US territorys...
American Samoa
Federated States of Micronesia
Guam
Marshall Islands
Northern Mariana Islands
Puerto Rico
Palau
Virgin Islands
and until recently the Phillipines

just to name a few. Yes they are territorys. Their citizens can serve US military and they pay US taxes. They have no state rights and cannot vote in elections. This is not propaganda. The US fully acknowledges them as US provinces and always has even though most americans arent much aware of them.

Germany! fah they were trying to "liberate" their "Aryan brothers" not impoverished countries run by dictators who were responsible for OVER A MILLION DEATHS in the course of their reign many tens of thousands of which being at the hands of said dictators secret police force (and their sons who just decided to rape women for the hell of it).

Do you not see that as kindof an opinion? Im not saying that you arent correct but surely you see where the same COULD be said about the US by others. Doesnt mean its true but secret police, atrocities, and freeing someone from one form of government to another should surely sound familiar.

Why the HECK does a country like the US trying to free these people get treated like it's doing something wrong, maybe those big bad European powers should show more concern for the world outside their borders as well and start HELPING rid the world of dictators for a change. WHY THE HECK does getting rid of a freakin dictator now a days become a BAD THING. think about a world with no dictators? Wouldn't that be great.....

Generally any country crossing into another because they dont like who is in charge has been frowned on. Even when its done for the right reasons it hasnt been liked because someone is bound to disagree with who was chosen and why. Often not the first one, but the second or the third such choice. They all gradually get more and more questionable in the eyes of others.

And RUSSIA "liberating" their neighbors from rival empires was land grabbing that's all, they too occupied said nations and turned them into paying provinces with no independant government or anything of that sort.

Again kindof point of view. If you check the list of US territories you find that most of them were areas we occupied after a war for the purpose of helping them recover. And we are still in most of them. To some that would be "spoils of war". Im sure there are good reasons for it, Im just pointing out that the same facts can be worded different ways depending on who is doing the wording.

Now moving onto your remark on those terrorist scum crossing the borders to "liberate" Iraq from the US LIBERATION IS NOT THEIR INTENT! they simply want to kill as man servants of "The Great Satan" as they can else wise they would actually try to defeat the army and not just kill women children and their own "Islamic brothers" without discression....that is not LIBERATION by ANY definition.....

Wow. Where to begin. You dont expect that to sit as a "fact" do you? The way you worded it? Thats what they are doing and how they see it?