|
|
|
 |

February 2nd, 2005, 07:16 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 2,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
Is this post still alive?
__________________
O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
-Stargate SG1
|

February 2nd, 2005, 09:18 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
Quote:
StrategiaInUltima said:
Is this post still alive?
|
You might also check out this thread, Beams v Missles We ended up with two threads with the same name, and there are some possibly helpful comments in the other one.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

February 2nd, 2005, 01:50 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 317
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
I still think Missles are useful throughout the entire game. The reason is that A combined arms approach allwos you a chance to defeat the talisman or the crystal defence. And if you achieve industral superiority then missles become even more effective. If you saturate a defender with missles then after the point defense has fired the defending ships start using beam weapons to take out missles then your beam ships have a better chance to approach and fire. Combined arms missles drones fighters and plenty of Fleet ships can win against any specialty weapon. But the logistics and micromanaging nightmare is a factor.
__________________
The fact that slaughter is a horrifying spectacle must make us take war more seriously, but does not provide an excuse for gradually blunting our swords in the name of humanity. Sooner or later, someone will come along with a sharper sword and hack off our arms
Clausewitz
|

February 2nd, 2005, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
I do not believe any beam weapons can target missiles other than PDC...
|

February 2nd, 2005, 04:08 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
Quote:
geoschmo said:
We ended up with two threads with the same name, and there are some possibly helpful comments in the other one.
|
Geo you linked to the same thread!! Are you trying to confuse me?!?
__________________
Caduceus
|

February 2nd, 2005, 04:18 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
Quote:
wildcard06 said:
Quote:
geoschmo said:
We ended up with two threads with the same name, and there are some possibly helpful comments in the other one.
|
Geo you linked to the same thread!! Are you trying to confuse me?!?
|
No I didn't. I linked to the other thread with the same name as this one. That's the point.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

February 2nd, 2005, 04:28 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
We could always change the title of this thread to "Beams vs Missiles II" to clear things up...
__________________
Things you want:
|

February 3rd, 2005, 12:12 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
Oog, my brain. I asked the same question 20 days apart... I am getting seriously sleep deprived.
__________________
Caduceus
|

February 3rd, 2005, 12:13 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Union, SC
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Beams v Missiles
i.e. I posted the same category question. I forgot that I had posted it already.
__________________
Caduceus
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|