|
|
|
 |

February 8th, 2005, 08:20 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
Quote:
Kuritza_Dru said:
Well, the problem is, I'm hard-pressed now, so I have to summon some effective troops
|
I'd summon lamias and mandragoras and vine ogres. Idea is to put few (3-4) smallish vine ogre squads in the front, 1 or 2 larger groups of lamias slightly behind and spread out several mandragora squads across the field (but more towards the rear). Script mandragoras to attack largest, ogres and lamias to hold&attack or attack. This setup will make the army relatively sturdy (for that level of research) and reasonably good against various armies/SCs. Add some mages, guarded by ogres to custom-tailor the army
|

February 8th, 2005, 08:35 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
My vote, in your situation, is for the lamias simply because they transform and thus will last longer on the battlefiend than mandragoras and vine ogres are slow to get a group together, plus not all that effective once you do. 1 vine ogre vs 5 lamias vs...8 mandragoras? each summons, i'd choose the lamias. But you still need a few turns to get lamias or mandragoras out in a large enough unit/regiment.
|

February 8th, 2005, 09:05 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
The Vine Ogres are a long term investment where you need like 3 or 4 nature mages pumping 2 each turn... after a dozen turns you have a nice meat shield for your different mage armies.
The lamias are good if you need the troops now or if your opponent has lots of priests.
The mandragoras are great since it takes several banishments for one to fall, plus they will put the approaching enemy troops or SC asleep with the attacks. Also they are definitely worth the price if the caster is a high nature level.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

February 9th, 2005, 02:53 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
One thing I forgot that could very well make mandragoras better is that, i believe, they aren't affected by morale. IE-no routing worries.
|

February 9th, 2005, 01:39 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
Ivy Kings get 4 vine ogres/summoning at a cost of 1N per spell. That's pretty good economics after a few turns. 20 vine ogres is a very nice meat shield. Twenty ogres in five turns for 25N (20N for Ivy King plus 5 for the ogres) vs. 20 turns for 20N (assuming one caster and no ivy crown) is a pretty good tradeoff.
|

February 9th, 2005, 01:47 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bavaria , Germany
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
Ivy kings have also the advantage to be good Battlemages .
They are a very worthy charm platform 
|

February 9th, 2005, 01:53 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Lamias vs mandragoras
Yes, they are a favorite summons whenever I have good access to Nature.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|