|
|
|
 |
|

March 15th, 2005, 06:35 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Well, someone suggested this. The results were repeating, until a certain pretender joined the stage, winner was uncertain, after that all fights were taken by him.
What is really funny is that abysia had some hilarius 2-fight performance, looking like sure winner in the first fight but not following his script on the second.
Notes: I hope I got everything right, if you think I messed something up I still have the save from turn before, so I can fix it and see if results still correlate.
The battle order is not random at ALL, it's just direct order of nation numbers.
I forgot to do the exp thingie, but there were only 2 heroics in the fights, both with precision and neither used spells that uses precision.
Oh, am I going to announce the winner?
No, you'll have to dl the file and see fot yourself. The winner combatant is named after a forum name.
|

March 15th, 2005, 06:51 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Whoa. Its direct order of nation numbers? Is that how it is with normal battles? People have always said it was random but I dont know of anyone having actually tested it.
Can't wait to d/l this when I get home!
Quote:
Tuna said:
The battle order is not random at ALL, it's just direct order of nation numbers.
No, you'll have to dl the file and see fot yourself. The winner combatant is named after a forum name.
|
|

March 15th, 2005, 07:04 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
can you post the turn file for 1 before the battle?
|

March 15th, 2005, 07:23 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Why not.
|

March 15th, 2005, 08:05 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Ah well I should have used a better chassis. Maybe a nat instead. Probably wouldn't have helped in the end. At least I took down one other sc  Congrats to the winner.
Thanks for putting this together tuna!
|

March 15th, 2005, 09:19 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Notes for next time: No directed randoms. Actually, I will clearmagic everyone and then add back the basic paths. That means, no random paths AT ALL.
And stock with some MR, ffs
No spell research, I will just tell everyone to name the spells they want to use, and add them in in the file. Lot less hassle. Perhaps some limit on high-level spells to make it more combat-oriented.
Oh, and figured out that phoenix pyre was utterly suicidal 
|

March 15th, 2005, 09:24 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 753
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
BAH, I'm at work so I can't check to see how my horse fared. I turned him in feeling he didn't have much of a shot, but after I looked at the actual rules (Full Gembox? Random + Additional Paths?) I knew he wouldn't last long.
I hope he at least killed one other SC. Poor little fancy lad.
|

March 16th, 2005, 05:59 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Quote:
BigDaddy said:
Tuna, I'm sure he means "I'm very frustrated, but Thank You for all the hard work, could you run another?"
|
Quote:
Tuna said:
Notes for next time: No directed randoms. Actually, I will clearmagic everyone and then add back the basic paths. That means, no random paths AT ALL.
No spell research, I will just tell everyone to name the spells they want to use, and add them in in the file. Lot less hassle. Perhaps some limit on high-level spells to make it more combat-oriented.
|
Wonder why I made those remarks.
The problem with spell research is that so much can go wrong in those 18 turns, I had to revert twice. The research part was by far the most work. Perhaps I should add a couple of low-level spells to everyone in addition to their requested ones?
Any new rule suggestions, and I'm all ears.
|

March 15th, 2005, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
:cries:
And I was doing so well...
I think Hellbinds and Mind Enslaves are UNFAIR! I mean, that's not what did me in, but it probably would have  A contest without them would be much more fun, since they change it from a "Supercombattant" contest into a "Supermage" contest that depends only on who goes first.
Also, I like the way my tail was chopped off, and then regrew for the next battle!
Edit:
Thanks for hosting this, Tuna!
Edit 2:
Hope that didn't sound like I was whining... I was whining, of course, I just don't want it to sound like I was 
|

March 15th, 2005, 07:16 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The Grand Anti-SC competition! - Results!
Nice battles! Good strategy person who shall remain nameless, dont want to ruin it for others who have not seen the battles.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|