SEV Betatest...

se5a · #1 March 18th, 2005, 03:38 PM

d000d that is soooo sweet.
I might try that some day (yea right, like I will ever get around to it)
so water cooling might be a good idea then? or maybe build it in a mini frezer

Makinus · #2 March 18th, 2005, 04:10 PM

Thermodyne, your comp is dream of any computer tinkerer...

I had a long time ago a monster computer that i build using several old boards and processors, if i remember well it was 3 486-66mhz and 2 Pentium 133 with every board networked with the others and a stripped down version of Win95 in every HD (they ranged from 500mb up to 2gb in one of the pentiums)... my idea was to create a gaming network to play DukeNuken3D and other games, and i plugged monitors and keyboards in every ne of them.... i and me fried gave it the name of "Frankie" because it was a whole mess of cables, boards and eletrical discharges... i lost it to an eletrical surge that fried the majority of the boards...

Your machine looks like a big brother of my old "Frankie", minus the monitors and keyboards...

hummm, lets see what bits and pieces i have around here to see if i can build something.....

Timstone · #3 March 18th, 2005, 04:13 PM

Carefull my friend MAkinus, don't frie yourself. That would be... less desirable.

btw, don't forget to send me a message when SE V comes available.

Oh no! Makinus and Thermodyne made a horrible monster! It's alive! Run for your live!

Instar · #4 March 18th, 2005, 06:45 PM

Thermodyne, I totally owe you a burrito now. I wonder if its possible to find RAM disks these days, since normal HDs are so cheap. I would like to find a RAM disk that uses SATA, that would be sweet. I'm sure if I was an electronics whiz, I get a controller and rig it up.

Puke · #5 March 18th, 2005, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Ram disks can be software and use set aside blocks of system ram, or they can be hardware based. The ones I used were just little plastic things that plugged into the IDE cables.

Ram disks are portions of your RAM that are set aside as virtual HDD space. what you are describing sounds like a FLASH disk, which would be non-volotile and orders of magnitude slower.

RAM disks are more or less obsolete due to modern memory management practices. it used to be that you could make things run uber-fast by putting the program on a RAM disk instead of your hard drive, and taking advantage of the higher speed of the memory and of the faster bus that the SIMM / DIMM banks were on.

These days, computers have such stupidly large quantities of memory, and OS memory management routines are so advanced, you will generally be slowing yourself down by second-guessing your system and trying to force software to run on a ram disk.

There are, however, solid state FLASH based hard disks with no moving parts in them. these are crazy fast, and models exist for both SCSI-3, Fibrechannel, and IDE. now if you just had a massive SAN filled with them...

Thermodyne · #6 March 18th, 2005, 09:12 PM

Flash is not the same thing. It works the same but is built on a newer technology. The first ram drives actually had sticks of sdram ram, and 1/2 a gig was huge. today they use ddram and go up into the tarabite range.

Quote:

Entry-level Solid State Disk
For the RamSan-120, the key word is small- small in size, small in price, and ideal for accelerating the small capacity database, database log or email queue. But while the 1U RamSan-120 is small, it is also powerful. The RamSan-120 provides two 2Gbit Fibre Channel ports capable of over 70,000 random I/Os per second and 400MB/second of bandwidth. Because the system uses DDR RAM for storage, the latency for data requests from servers is under 20 microseconds.

The little drives I have predate flash, sodimm I would think based on age and IDE 33 standards marked on them.

Puke · #7 March 18th, 2005, 09:30 PM

so what your talking about is volitile storage? it could be fast, but the overhead required to populate it would be anoying.

Thermodyne · #8 March 18th, 2005, 09:39 PM

Yep, every time you power down it needs to be reloaded. But ghost casting makes it quick.

David E. Gervais · #9 March 19th, 2005, 08:24 AM

Maybe the next gen of OS will see a return to having the the OS on ROM. I always thought that made a big difference in speed. And now days the technology is getting to where having several Gig of ROM is very doable.

The biggest benefit would be that the systems themselves would need to be designed with some sort of conformity. That would in return stabalize the PC market that is just progressing too fast for the general public. (Why do you think consoles are popular? two reasons, Price and the fact they they remain a stable platform for several years instead of becomming obsolete as soo as you make the purchase.

Oh well, my vote is to go the OS on ROM rute.

Nuf said, Cheers!

P.S. But what does all this have to do with the SE5 beta? Nothing So might I suggest we start a new thread about "The future of PC's and Super Rigs."

Lisif Deoral · #10 March 19th, 2005, 08:48 AM

maybe not ROM, but repackaging an OS as some sort of flashable bios extension might be nice (you need to be able to easily patch it)... what about a name like aios (advanced i/o system), or maybe aiospabocus for win-like OSes (advanced i/o system, plus a bunch of completely useless stuff).

Uhm... I like "aiospabocus"