|
|
|
View Poll Results: Your Age
|
56 - GeezerHood
|
  
|
2 |
2.60% |
51 - 55
|
  
|
2 |
2.60% |
46 - 50
|
  
|
4 |
5.19% |
41 - 45
|
  
|
7 |
9.09% |
36 - 40
|
  
|
11 |
14.29% |
26 - 35
|
  
|
18 |
23.38% |
19 - 25
|
  
|
19 |
24.68% |
15 - 18
|
  
|
14 |
18.18% |
12 - 14
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
 |

April 30th, 2005, 01:49 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
Looks like we're short on geezers-in-training according to that chart
A surprisingly smooth curve on the bar graph though.
__________________
Things you want:
|

April 30th, 2005, 11:50 PM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,951
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
Sj, yes I know, however, only 52 have voted in the age area, now I know that more then that have viewed this thread, and, ahem, I'm sure some of them may be "Geezers in Lurking"  I just wonder who the 2 "others" are, if they are not male nor female, but are an Other, does that make us dithers? 
__________________
just some ideas Mac
BEWARE; crochety old geezers play SE4, in between bathroom runs
Phong's Head Parking
|

May 1st, 2005, 01:55 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: User Ages
Geezers in Lurking = GIL's. acceptable
Geezers in Training = GIT's. not politically correct.
This has been a public service announcement. Thank you.
__________________
Slick.
|

May 4th, 2005, 05:10 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
Quote:
mac5732 said:
I just wonder who the 2 "others" are, if they are not male nor female, but are an Other, does that make us dithers?
|
General Constructor of Delirian Cyberdom (conveyor assembling)
and
Maharajah of Hybridos Weirdity (left-up-female prim sex)
I always knew that deep RP is a beginning of a long jorney to asylum. 
|

May 5th, 2005, 10:42 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL.
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
It’s a sense of humor thing.
You would have gotten the same results if the poll had been.
1. Human
2. Duck
3. Other
Except you may have gotten more #2s.
|

May 5th, 2005, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Searching for a holy grail.
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
Honesltly I'd have been more surprised if we got any #2s on this survey. I mean others was expected, any females would have actually shocked me.
Sexist? Me? A hairy arsed mining engineer? Nooo 
__________________
He who disagrees with me in private, call him a fool. He who disagrees with me in public, call him an ambulance.
|

May 9th, 2005, 12:02 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,951
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
Bumpty bump
__________________
just some ideas Mac
BEWARE; crochety old geezers play SE4, in between bathroom runs
Phong's Head Parking
|

May 9th, 2005, 08:25 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: User Ages
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|