Re: Soviet auto-loaders
"Now can someone explaine why Unit #584 125mm2A45ATG in the Russian OOB only has a ROF of 5?"
Did you bother to look at the other AT guns and their ROF.? The bigger the gun the lower the ROF for ATG. An 85mm is 7, a 100mm is 6, and a 125mm is 5. It's a perfectly logical progression and makes perfect sense to me for that weapon.
"Russian T-80, ROF of 7. South Korean T-80ROK, ROF of 8. Why? "
IDK whoever put it into the OOB probably though since it's "westernized" in South Korean hands so it MUST be better than the Russian version so it should have a higher ROF. Did YOU look at what effect that one ROF makes in the game? I doubt it, or you wouldn't have mentioned it. It make no difference to the main armament, none. A typical ROK tank company with 8 ROF for that tank averaged between 3,6,6,- and 4,6,6- and a company of the same tanks with a 7 ROF average 3,5,5,- and 4,6,6,- so the net sum total is an extra shot with the AAMG's for a few of the tanks.
"Also what about the JSIII and T-10 with the 122mm gun. Should they have the same ROF as any Weastern tank with a gun of 90mm or above? Now remember this is 2 part ammo vs 1 part ammo, and no auto loader. "
The explanation from the previous post didn't mean anything at all to your did it? Do you want them to be reduced to 2 shots? That's the only alternative here. Would it make you happy if the T10's ROF was reduced to 4? I would think it would given you seem to base your questions on the stats in the game rather than what happens in the game. If T-10's were 4 ROF would that seem "fair" that this big clumsy Russian tank with two part ammo now has a ROF number 2 points lower than a "western" tank? Did you run any experiments to see what that would do? It lowers the number of shots of the MG's. I could reduce it to ONE ROF and all that would happen is the secondary armament doesn't get as many shots.
Don
|
Threaded Mode