.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT
Notices


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old January 1st, 2006, 11:07 PM
Mobhack's Avatar

Mobhack Mobhack is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,986
Thanks: 478
Thanked 1,921 Times in 1,249 Posts
Mobhack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Improvement proposal III - Spinning StuGs

Exactly as Double Deuce deduced !! - units need to be able to react in the enemy turn certainly, because of the IGO-UGO nature of the game.

Reducing the "quantum" of the turn interval allows finer distinctions, but the overlap would still be there, as well as the "freezing" of your unit in its end point for the entire enemy phase of the turn. The cost of that is more turns to do the same thing (or game systems with complex interacting sub-phases etc.)

The reaction return fire (and turning) is in there to balance the time overlap of P1 and P2 in a IGOUGO system.

For reaction fires - a unit which wants to turn to point a hull mounted weapon (hull turn) has a much lower chance than a turreted vehicle. Especially if it has moved.

I'll check the turn-to-face code and see if it is using the right sort of chances for hull turns.

But the bottom line is that because of the game system - enemy units must be able to react.

Cheers
Andy
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.