OT: Whatever Next?

AgentZero · #1 January 11th, 2006, 02:21 PM

douglas · #2 January 11th, 2006, 02:33 PM

Careful, someone might be annoyed by this and your forum name is obviously not your real name

.

Of course, you did put your real name in your profile and you're not even in the US, but still...

David E. Gervais · #3 January 11th, 2006, 02:44 PM

I got lost in the leagaleese.. does it mean I can or can't annoy people on the net because I use my real name? LoL, Or does it mean if I do they can prosecute me? And what is to prohibit someone from using my name (or someone else's) simply claiming that I annoy them? Laws that cannot be upheld or make it too easy to be abused are false laws and will eventually get replaced with marginally better adaptations of the law.

Nuf said, Cheers!

P.S. now wasn't this an annoying post? care to report me?

Suicide Junkie · #4 January 11th, 2006, 02:52 PM

Hey, most political sites annoy me.
I guess I could take a lot of politicians to court.

Strategia_In_Ultima · #5 January 11th, 2006, 03:02 PM

Good idea

See if you can get them drawn and quartered, or at least shot. Or try Old Sparky on them, and don't forget not to wet the sponge (if you've seen/read The Green Mile)!

edit: Ooh, so trolling is prohibited now..... there are some merits to this law..... But not enough to warrant saving those politicans' lives! Prosecute on, SJ!

No, seriously. If they wanted to, the Justice Dept. could sue someone and fine them and/or lock them up for two years just because they "annoyed" someone i.e. the Justice Dept. Yet another step to the United States of 1984. Sheesh.

AgentZero · #6 January 11th, 2006, 03:03 PM

Quote:

David E. Gervais said:

P.S. now wasn't this an annoying post? care to report me?

Well, after grinding through the legalease, it looks like as long as you use your real name, you won't be affected. So, David, you're free to be as annoying as you like, but I on the other hand must behave myself.

Except I don't live in the States, so I think I'll educate US senators on the futility of trying to legislate the internet by sending them annoying emails, mocking them from outside their juristiction.

I wonder if the law would apply to all the uber-l33t n00b-basher!!!11's in WoW, AO, etc. If so then,

/me staples a copy of the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act to their collective foreheads.

douglas · #7 January 11th, 2006, 03:39 PM

Let's see, the specific language, quoted from the article you linked, is "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

It seems to me that any online multiplayer game not played over a local network could be interpreted to qualify, and merely trying to play competitively could be enough - your opponent could find it annoying to actually have to work for a win. As written, this law could conceivably be used as the basis for suing someone just for winning a game of SEIV

. Noob bashing through the chat feature of a game like WoW would definitely qualify.

Quote:

AgentZero said:I on the other hand must behave myself.

Assuming your profile isn't lying, Tim McElwain, you don't have anything to worry about even if Ireland joins the US later today.

Fyron · #8 January 11th, 2006, 03:51 PM

That article doesn't cover the issue very well, I think... Try this one.

narf poit chez BOOM · #9 January 11th, 2006, 04:40 PM

Hey, P? I think maybe you should start worrying.

AgentZero · #10 January 11th, 2006, 04:49 PM

Well, seeing as Fyron's article makes the point that the definition of 'Annoy' is different to the everyday definition of annoy (don't you love legalease), and that everything covered by this Act is already covered by other laws, I don't think anyone need really worry.

I just wonder if one could use the law outside US juristiction if the 'method of communication' is registered in the States. ie: If I want to b****-slap someone with this Act on the WoW EU servers, could I use the fact that Blizzard is a US company to my advantage. Not that I'd really need to... The few people in WoW who've managed to annoy me have been sent crying back to mommy in fairly short order, but it'd be nice to know for curiosity's sake.