|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

March 7th, 2006, 02:07 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Atlanta, Ga. USA
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
Hello, here is a nice website. It has pictures of the German prototype, as well as some interesting facts. The US prototype appears to incorporate the 152mm gun/launcher, which was the same as the M60A2 and the M551! That would have been quite a machine.
http://www.battletanks.com/mbt70.htm
|

March 7th, 2006, 04:52 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,409
Thanks: 103
Thanked 645 Times in 429 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
The US prototype appears to incorporate the 152mm gun/launcher, which was the same as the M60A2 and the M551
No, those were the short versions, the MBT-70 had a long barrelled 152mm gun.
|

March 7th, 2006, 08:08 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Atlanta, Ga. USA
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
My friend, I did not mean to offend. Though the weapon was a longer barrel 152mm prototype, the fact that it was to incorporate the Shillelagh missile is still an amazing idea.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...und/mbt-70.htm
"The US prototype was equipped with a 152mm gun launcher with an auto loader. It was capable of firing AP/HE/WP rounds and the Shillelagh Missile. The main armament was to be a long-barrelled improved XM-150 variant of the XM-81 gun/launcher mounted on the M551 Sheridan and the M60a2 Patton. This was a much more reliable weapon than the earlier variant, firing Sabot, HE, and Cannister rounds in addition to the Shilelagh A/T Missile, but the earlier weapon's reputation was such that it was a lost cause from the start. It had a coax 7.62 machinegun and a 20mm AA remote control gun in a separate part of the turret. It would pop up out of twin hatches and fire at the target. The German version had a 120mm autocannon, instead of the 152mm gun launcher."
There is an interesting review on Wikipedia: Here is the link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBT-70
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shillelagh_missile
And for more pictures:
http://www.panzerbaer.de/types/bw_kpz_70-a.htm

|

March 8th, 2006, 11:22 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 354
Thanks: 351
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
Did anyone tell you, by the way, that the Shillelagh had a one mile minimum range?
|

March 9th, 2006, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 120
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
Actually it's closer to 1/2 mile. The MGM-51 had a minimum range of 730 meters. As I understand it, the ballistic track of the missile caused it to drop out of the sight/tracker's field of vision within the minimum-range envelope.
Adrian
|

March 12th, 2006, 02:32 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 303
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
"Pop out of twin hatches and fire at the target"....?!
Sound like a trailer from Star Wars. No wonder the whole vehicle was a failure.
|

March 12th, 2006, 10:58 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 354
Thanks: 351
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: MBT-70
Still, it was a very cool tank. The prototypes that never make it into service are actually more interesting than the stuff that does the real fighting. How many German Maus superheavy tanks saw combat service in WWII? Zero. How many books where written about the Maus? Dozens.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|