Quote:
Graeme Dice said:
What was his attack rating listed for each weapon when you right clicked on the attack rating.
|
22,22,22,22
Quote:
The actual damage dealt by an armour negating weapon in this case would be 28 + 1d6oe - 1d6oe.
|
?? Oh. I never knew that. Even so, the chances are good that the damage would be higher than 2!
Quote:
Quote:
Can somebody tell me how flanking is supposed to work? It's -1 def per attack beyond the first each round, I think. Does that include attacks from the same creature?? ie. is my nataraja's 8th attack going to be with a -7 def penalty for the defender, if all 8 attacks are on the same target?
|
It's this case.
|
Er, sorry, I didn't understand that.
Quote:
Well, for one, don't cast returning, since you are bound to get hit once in a while.
|
I didn't cast it, it's intrinsic to the Virtue armour - but that was just a precaution. I wanted to see how much damage I could do before getting hit. That would be a good guide to see whether I could kill an ice devil or two without too much risk. I'm not surprised about getting hit at all; I am surprised that I did no damage whatsoever, despite 8 armour negating attacks, and that the flipping ice devils are draining life when they didn't damage me! Given my 22 att and their 20|26 def, cf their 20|28 att and my 43 def, I would expect to hit a *lot* more often than them - given that there were 8 attacks per round on each side.
CC
Re: What\'s wrong with this battle?
Threaded Mode