|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

September 26th, 2006, 10:57 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,616
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 5,816 Times in 2,870 Posts
|
|
Re: Why just an ANZAC OOB?
.......and nobody has ever really complained about it so you're the first, or maybe the second person this is has been issue for.
Don
|

September 26th, 2006, 11:48 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 134
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Why just an ANZAC OOB?
Andy, true is been there since SPI, but fundamentally why?
True we as two distinct nations sometimes join under one HQ but we do not live in the same tent for every war, WWII is an example.
Don, I was not complaining, just asking why this adherence was still being carried on.
I do not see ANZAC in MBT yet we were in the same places, Korea and Vietnam for starters, though New Zealand is not listed in MBT either.
You made the split for MBT, so was there a reason to keep the status quo?
|

September 26th, 2006, 03:00 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,616
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 5,816 Times in 2,870 Posts
|
|
Re: Why just an ANZAC OOB?
Because, as I said, it wasn't an issue for anyone before now. If it had been someone would surely have brought it up in 1998 when we first released sp2ww2 with "ANZAC" and then in 1999 when we released the first version of spww2 also with an "ANZAC" OOB. Here we are in the later half of 2006......8+ years later...... and we are discussing design decision made quite a long time ago. In MBT, New Zealand was, as I recall, removed because no one was interested in building an OOB specifically for it. The same reasons apply to the question as to why the two nations are joined in one OOB in SPWW2. Yes, I suppose it should have been split but it wasn't.....again.....because the joining wasn't an issue anyone really raised as being a problem that needed to be resolved. Even for the release of WinSPww2 when RSI was split from Italy and the Slovaks were split from the Czechoslovakian OOB the issue of splitting Australia and NZ from "ANZAC" was never raised because it was not thought to be a problem.
Don
|

September 26th, 2006, 09:06 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 134
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Why just an ANZAC OOB?
Ok.
|

October 2nd, 2006, 04:55 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Land of the Sabbath and of the Priest
Posts: 242
Thanks: 35
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Why just an ANZAC OOB? (Off topic)
"1998 when we first released sp2ww2"
Was it really that long ago??
Thanks to all the Camo Group members, past and present - you have eaten up much more of my time sitting at the PC than is good for me......
|

October 2nd, 2006, 05:48 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,616
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 5,816 Times in 2,870 Posts
|
|
Re: Why just an ANZAC OOB? (Off topic)
Quote:
JohnHale said:
"1998 when we first released sp2ww2"
Was it really that long ago??
|
Somedays it feels like forever but yes , Dec 1998 was the release of sp2ww2 and work on that started in January 1998
Don
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|