|
|
|
|
 |
October 13th, 2006, 05:45 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 731
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
I personally am against all signatures.
They are just annoying, boastful, and spammy.
The sole exception is a functional sig like Mindi's, used to clearly identify her official status and responsibilities.
|
October 13th, 2006, 07:10 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lancaster, OH, USA
Posts: 1,250
Thanks: 28
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
Quote:
Possum said:
I personally am against all signatures.
They are just annoying, boastful, and spammy.
|
Well see my post a few posts back about how to remove signatures from your view if you haven't done it already.
Quote:
The sole exception is a functional sig like Mindi's, used to clearly identify her official status and responsibilities.
|
Suck up.  
__________________
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
For those looking for  with this forum, please see Annette as I am retired. 
|
October 15th, 2006, 08:34 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 731
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
Quote:
Mindi said:
Quote:
Possum said:
I personally am against all signatures.
They are just annoying, boastful, and spammy.
|
Well see my post a few posts back about how to remove signatures from your view if you haven't done it already.
Quote:
The sole exception is a functional sig like Mindi's, used to clearly identify her official status and responsibilities.
|
Suck up.
|
LOL, who, me? ;0
Yes, that setting is there. It was hard to find, but I managed it, and confirmed that it works. |
October 23rd, 2006, 04:12 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
Restrictions are out, and with the 35K total limit, you're unfortunately over by 17K =(
|
October 23rd, 2006, 04:17 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
No problem!
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
October 23rd, 2006, 04:18 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
Part 2. Same images, essentually nil loss of quality, less than 35kb. 
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
October 23rd, 2006, 04:53 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Minnesota/South Dakota
Posts: 1,439
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: \"some limits on graphics in signatures\"
Alright I am compliant now that I have used some creative saving
Phoenix your 2 images together were alrger than 35kb
__________________
You can give a man fire and he will be warm for a day but set him on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
A* Se+++ GdQ $? Fr! C* Css Sf-- Ai% Au M+++ Mp* S@ Ss++++ RNSHP Pw++ Fq+++ Nd++ Rp++ G++++ Mm++ Bb+++@ L+ Tcp--
Get the newest Version of Invasion! here: http://www.secenter.org/
 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode