.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 7th, 2003, 01:11 PM
mlmbd's Avatar

mlmbd mlmbd is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mlmbd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

*BUMP*

mlmbd
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 17th, 2003, 01:55 PM
mlmbd's Avatar

mlmbd mlmbd is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mlmbd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

dogscoff, Hey 'Boss'!

mlmbd
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 12th, 2003, 05:45 PM
mlmbd's Avatar

mlmbd mlmbd is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mlmbd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

dogscoff, can we pickup this dicussion, again? I am getting ready to release 'my' first shipset. It will not only be NeoStandard. But, it will include all of the images for PvK's Proportions Mod (plus ones he is planning to add) and about 1/2 of the images Fyron wanted.

I was thinking of calling it NeoStanard ++. Any comments?

mlmbd
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 12th, 2003, 05:57 PM
dogscoff's Avatar

dogscoff dogscoff is offline
General
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dogscoff is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

OK... well, that sounds good to me. From the discussion on this thread I think the neostandard should be left as it is, but a second set of ships would be an excellent idea, and I don't think anyone will have a problem with the name "neostandard ++"

It sounds like you've already made a list. What sizes do you have in there? I'm planning to go beyond the neo-standard with my KanesS set, so I'll probably fall into line with you.

[ March 12, 2003, 16:25: Message edited by: dogscoff ]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 12th, 2003, 06:24 PM
dogscoff's Avatar

dogscoff dogscoff is offline
General
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dogscoff is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

Thought it was about time this thread had a name change=-)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 13th, 2003, 12:57 AM
mlmbd's Avatar

mlmbd mlmbd is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mlmbd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

Here is the neo-standard++ list:

neo-standard++.txt

mlmbd
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old March 13th, 2003, 01:17 AM

Gryphin Gryphin is offline
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gryphin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

mlmbd
That is a great list, thanks.
Um, would I be a jerk if I aksked you to:
Identify which goes with wich mod
What the expected sizes are.
Well, would I?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.