The neo-standard thread- Standardising additional hull sizes.

[dogscoff]

OK... well, that sounds good to me. From the discussion on this thread I think the neostandard should be left as it is, but a second set of ships would be an excellent idea, and I don't think anyone will have a problem with the name "neostandard ++"

It sounds like you've already made a list. What sizes do you have in there? I'm planning to go beyond the neo-standard with my KanesS set, so I'll probably fall into line with you.

[ March 12, 2003, 16:25: Message edited by: dogscoff ]

[dogscoff]

Thought it was about time this thread had a name change=-)

[mlmbd]

Here is the neo-standard++ list:

neo-standard++.txt

mlmbd

[Gryphin]

mlmbd
That is a great list, thanks.
Um, would I be a jerk if I aksked you to:
Identify which goes with wich mod
What the expected sizes are.
Well, would I?

[mlmbd]

Gryphin,

Um, would I be a jerk if I aksked you to:
Identify which goes with wich mod
What the expected sizes are.
Well, would I?

No, not at all. I am not sure about all the images, and the data, you want. But, I will find out and add that info to the text file!

In fact, anyone that knows the Mod/Modder and or the size (in kilotons) of the images, post it here! Thanks!

mlmbd

[dogscoff]

In fact, anyone that knows the Mod/Modder and or the size (in kilotons) of the images

The neo-standard images don't have specific kiloton values assigned to them. They are just images. It is up to the modder to decide how big that ship should be.

Or, more accurately, you could say that the modder creates a hull size and then decides which of the additional images fits it best.

[trooper]

Does anyone know a shipset designer ready to create 66 pictures for a shipset ? Neo standard in its current Version ask a lot of work (more than most designers are ready to provide...) for the 20 supplementary pictures. But this neostandard++ seems far two wide.
Nethertheless, that's my opinion.