|
|
|
 |
|

November 25th, 2006, 08:27 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
Quote:
Epaminondas said:
Quote:
Agrajag said:
Well, I did just say that's my guess as to what he thought....
Either way I don't see why you have to get so upset, you did get your answer after all, and considering how you are just another anonymous person over here, there's no reason not to be suspicious. Other than being curteous to other people.
|
2. So you think it's normal to accuse everyone who doesn't have the game manual to have a pirated version instead of just a demo version? Even if you subtract the evidence I put forth before that clearly demonstrate that I don't know what happens in late game and do not have full version of the game, I'd suspect just as a percentage thing that the most reasonable assumption is actually that someone who doesn't have a manual only has a Demo copy rather than a pirated copy.
|
Compare what I said in italic and what you said in italic.
Quote:
Epaminondas said:
If anything, that shows that a lot of people do agree with me in feeling that there is a problem with the base human commander or hero HPs.
|
If anything, that shows that a lot of people do disagree with you in feeling that there is a problem with the base human commnder or hero HPs...
All this means is that there is much debate on the subject. Just because a lot of people discuss something it doesn't mean they think one way or another about it, just that they think about it.
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|

November 25th, 2006, 12:04 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
A little common sense please!
If I want to play giants I play giants. If I want to play munchkins I play munchkins. If I want sea I don't play land.
Each makes for a totaly different playing style. That is what makes this game great.
If you want a mighty commander than give him toys. If you don't like the toys then you can mod some. What more do you want?
|

November 25th, 2006, 12:13 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
I don´t think anyone wants humans to be giants. The problem is simply that most human thuggie heroes are practically basic commanders with a trivial stat increase.
Take marius lorca for example:
Unmodded he is an 80gp Emerald lod with +1 hp +1 str +1 att, +1 def, +2 morale, + 2 ap and one less encumbrance.
A recruitable emerald lord with 2 stars of experience is a better fighter than marius, who is supposed to be a living legend.
Shouldn´t a living legend excel the run of the mill recruitables a little bit?
|

November 25th, 2006, 12:42 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
One thing popped to mind.
If it's 'unrealistic' or whatever that human heroes have more hp.
How is it not unrealistic if they get it from a heroic ability?
Why can't our HEROES have more than average hp, if our HEROES can? 
|

November 27th, 2006, 03:56 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 34
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
Quote:
Hullu said:
One thing popped to mind.
If it's 'unrealistic' or whatever that human heroes have more hp.
How is it not unrealistic if they get it from a heroic ability?
Why can't our HEROES have more than average hp, if our HEROES can?
|
Yah, this is the point I get stuck on too.
An Emerald Lord or something who gets unequaled obesity or the other HP boosting heroic ability and hangs around in the hall of fame for a while can gain a decent cushion of HP and will indeed survive hits that would kill a normal man.
If he can do it, why can't some of the national heroes do it? Why is it that the only way to get that HP up is via a random ability?
|

November 27th, 2006, 04:11 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
Quote:
Action said:
Quote:
Hullu said:
One thing popped to mind.
If it's 'unrealistic' or whatever that human heroes have more hp.
How is it not unrealistic if they get it from a heroic ability?
Why can't our HEROES have more than average hp, if our HEROES can?
|
Yah, this is the point I get stuck on too.
An Emerald Lord or something who gets unequaled obesity or the other HP boosting heroic ability and hangs around in the hall of fame for a while can gain a decent cushion of HP and will indeed survive hits that would kill a normal man.
If he can do it, why can't some of the national heroes do it? Why is it that the only way to get that HP up is via a random ability?
|
Other, non-random, ways are Prophetizing and Wish.
Heroic abilities are a bit exaggerated, especially when some of them get to high levels. People with high heroic abilities are more like the characters some people are wanting to see. I prefer to get legendary Defense skill to legendary ability to not die when butchered (i.e. Hit Points), personally. I agree that it's too bad it requires the attention of the gods who oversee the Hall of Fame to get them, and that they are a bit much in some cases. I'd like to see more minor abilities, and a different way to earn them besides the HoF.
|

November 26th, 2006, 01:24 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
Quote:
Turin said:
I don´t think anyone wants humans to be giants. The problem is simply that most human thuggie heroes are practically basic commanders with a trivial stat increase.
Take marius lorca for example:
Unmodded he is an 80gp Emerald lod with +1 hp +1 str +1 att, +1 def, +2 morale, + 2 ap and one less encumbrance.
A recruitable emerald lord with 2 stars of experience is a better fighter than marius, who is supposed to be a living legend.
Shouldn´t a living legend excel the run of the mill recruitables a little bit?
|
Yes, you're basically right - The way it currently works, many of the randomly-arriving heroes are just above-average and slightly unique. They only live up to their descriptions if they survive to get experience and items and/or heroic abilities or are made prophets or whatever.
I don't really see that as a big problem, though I think they could be several levels better in abilities like fighting skills without breaking balance. On the other hand, if the mundane heroes were to be given boosts so that they arrived much better than average commanders, I'd miss having the kind of heroes we have now - the "hero material" guys. Though those could be added too as regenerating heroes for all nations. Especially now that we can mod two types of those in for every nation...
As for Marius Lorca, just to annoyingly quibble about your example, he may not be much better than an Emerald Lord, but Emerald Lords are some of the best human melee foot commanders in the game, so adding a bunch of +1's to one of them is actually quite good from a mortal human perspective. Vanheim's Vanlade is even less impressive compared to typical Vans (he's about the same), though again, mounted Vans are some of the best mounter human combat commanders (and they have magic too).
PvK
|

November 26th, 2006, 09:55 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
Quote:
PvK said:
As for Marius Lorca, just to annoyingly quibble about your example, he may not be much better than an Emerald Lord, but Emerald Lords are some of the best human melee foot commanders in the game, so adding a bunch of +1's to one of them is actually quite good from a mortal human perspective.
|
Marius Lorca is one of the few units in Dominions who has base Attack rating over 15. He has 16. Bane Lords, Scorpion Men, the Devourer of Souls, Devata, Dai Oni, one Heliophagus - 14. Firbolgs, Tartarians, at least 3 of the elemental royalty, Arch Devil, Abomination, angelic Seraph - 15. In a quick browse through the manual, I found only Wraith Consuls, Wraith Lords and the Ashen Angels (from Manifestation), and Horrors (from Send Horror). Horrors had attack 18, the three others had attack 16.
Marius Lorca is impossibly skilled - unfortunately, that doesn't help him to survive in battles. Not much. He'd need expensive equipment, and could still easily die. He'd be easy to kill as well, if he did survive to become enough of a threat.
|

November 26th, 2006, 12:51 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
Well, Marius Lorca is a hero, but lets talk Emerald Lord (who is nearly as bad-***.)
The emerald lord costs *80 gold*.
That's roughly equivalent to a four or five gem summoned monster. The emerald lord, on average, smacks a wyvern like a red-headed stepchild. So, the emerald lord doesn't need more than 15 hit points - if he had 25, he'd beat the wyvern almost every time, which would be unfair.
Now, it's true, the niefel lord is a *way* better chassis than he is. This is why the niefel lord costs six times as much.
So, I'd agree that -
Mantle of Life (Constr 6, NNEE) - Body Prot 13, +20 hp.
Blood Vigor Charm (Constr 4, BB) - +10 hp. That's 1 hit point per blood slave.
Equinox (Constr 8, AAAANNN) - Sword, poisonous, does lightning damage, resist poison and lightning, +30 hit points.
etc. would be fair and reasonable.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|

December 3rd, 2006, 01:30 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: The problem of low hit points on humans
That explanation makes it clearer what you were suggesting, Uh-Nu-Buh, and it sounds quite reasonable to me when explained that way.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|