.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 6th, 2006, 06:54 PM
Endoperez's Avatar

Endoperez Endoperez is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
Endoperez is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

Quote:
Stryke11 said:
Or a national spell that perhaps evens out the magic differences. A battlefield wide "anti-magic" or somesuch which would make Ulm troops' martial superiority actually useful. The spell could either lower penetration, cause spells to randomly fail (or small chance to overload/kill the enemy mage), raise cost of spells like a mini drain dominion, or something of that type.

I love Ulm and I play them SP all the time. Don't think I'd MP them, but I'm not very good at MP so I'd probably lose with dual blessed Helheim.
Ulm does have one national battlefield-wide spell. It's called Tempering the Will. It takes an E3 mage (any Master Smith with one of: Earth Boots, Earth Power, gem), doesn't cost any gems, and gives +4 MR to any friendly unit that fails an easy magic resistance roll. Thau 5, though. The chance for spell to have an effect is from 18% (MR 10 (drain dominion) - penetrating bonus of 6 for an easy spell and E3 caster) to 24% (MR 9, or neutral dominion) to 30% (MR 8, Magic dominion). With two-three mages casting the spell, most of your army will get +4 magic resistance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 7th, 2006, 12:16 AM

Stryke11 Stryke11 is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA. USA
Posts: 220
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stryke11 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

Whoops, sorry. I should have checked that before I posted.





Still think causing an enemy mage's head to explode when they cast a spell (even if only 5% chance or so) would be super cool.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 7th, 2006, 03:06 AM
Ighalli's Avatar

Ighalli Ighalli is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 133
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ighalli is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

According to page 86, the penality for penetration with an easy spell is -4, not -6. Also, the caster wins ties, so unless I'm mistaken the MR 10 value is 24%, the MR 9 is 30% and the MR 8 is 38%. Not that it makes a very significant difference. If you have access to any astral, you can forge some penetration items (up to +3 penetration at con 4) for your smiths that would help the process. With both items you'd be up to 46%/54%/62% respectively.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 7th, 2006, 01:07 PM
Endoperez's Avatar

Endoperez Endoperez is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
Endoperez is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

Quote:
Ighalli said:
According to page 86, the penality for penetration with an easy spell is -4, not -6. Also, the caster wins ties, so unless I'm mistaken the MR 10 value is 24%, the MR 9 is 30% and the MR 8 is 38%. Not that it makes a very significant difference. If you have access to any astral, you can forge some penetration items (up to +3 penetration at con 4) for your smiths that would help the process. With both items you'd be up to 46%/54%/62% respectively.
I counted the penetrating bonus [MR - 6] as [MR - (10-4)]. I'm not sure whether or not the caster wins ties.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 7th, 2006, 02:09 PM

curtadams curtadams is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
curtadams is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

Well, having 3 equipped smiths to boost *some* of your army's MR by 4 doesn't seem too thrilling to me. Large area destruction spells are mostly damage. This really doesn't seem like the kind of spell your army should be resisting. Is this a bug?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 7th, 2006, 03:59 PM
Teraswaerto's Avatar

Teraswaerto Teraswaerto is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Teraswaerto is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

MR increase can be great against R'lyeh (mindblast), and there are spells like Polymorph that you'll really wish you had high MR against. Most of the time it wont make much difference though.

ME Ulm seems quite weak, it's true. It has always been thus.
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 7th, 2006, 05:33 PM
Sandman's Avatar

Sandman Sandman is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 477
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sandman is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm

Ulm needs more trickery up its sleeve. Assassins and a stealthy preacher, for example, making it the equal of Marignon in that department (it was originally supposed to be a counterpart to Marignon anyway). And reduce the old age on Master Smiths; they're a 'young kingdom'.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.