|
|
|
|
 |
December 19th, 2006, 03:03 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Argentina
Posts: 478
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I´m not in favor of VP. Let´s vote.
__________________
" Jefe, le presento a Manuk, el hombre de la sonrisa de hierro "
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:16 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I like VP. I vote for victory points.
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 402
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I'm fine with VP if they are not cumulative. Otherwise I would vote against them.
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:19 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I believe host preferences are the small reward for doing the effort of hosting. I think we should go with whatever settings you want Manuk. IF its a vote, I cast my vote that way. Please do the game as you wish.
XOX
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:24 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I agree with Xox. You instigated this game, and although I am hosting it for you; I consider you to be the one running the game so it should be your choice.
I am happy to play with whatever settings you decide upon.
__________________
Regno Dominatio
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:32 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
My preference is for non-cumulative VPs, though of course the host has the final say.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:36 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
How about this - whoever controls the most provinces when the next President of the US is sworn in, is the winner  ?
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
December 19th, 2006, 04:00 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
VP's, I will go with whatever the host thinks.
Turnaround, 24hr quickhost is great for the early game, turns 1-20 but I recommend 48hr quickhost after that, otherwise you will get lots of players having stale turns.
|
December 19th, 2006, 04:24 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Norriton, PA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I am in favor of non-cumilative VPs.
That way the winner will still be the most powerful/most land, but you dont have to conquer every last thing. It also eliminates the frustration of turtling water nations.
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:04 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 304
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
If we are voting, I vote for VP, but it seems like most people don't want cumulative so I vote for Standard VP.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode