|
|
|
 |

December 2nd, 2001, 08:51 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
quote: But it gets quite bothersome to plug incredible amounts of engines onto large ships
Make bigger engines.  The AI doesn't use them well, but that can be fixed too, with enough fiddling.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

December 2nd, 2001, 06:49 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
The current system is pretty good but unrealistic. The balance is right with small ships getting defensive bonus and big ships getting mounts.
The most unrealistic thing is that movement of large ships is only restricted by cutting down the number of engines on them. The Newtonian movement would hit the spot because it would allow making large ships fast if you wanted to spent more resources on them.
But I think there won't be many changes to SE4 anymore. Maybe they could be in a mod or SE5.
|

December 2nd, 2001, 08:24 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
quote: Maybe they could be in a mod or SE5.
Pirates and Nomads
TechMod
That's at *least* two with newtonian movement..
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

December 2nd, 2001, 09:57 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
quote: Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
Pirates and Nomads
TechMod
I need to check those. If I remember right SE3 had a system where larger ships had to have more engines to get same movement. Wonder why it was changed.
|

December 2nd, 2001, 10:17 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
Making a SE3 style system is even easier, since you don't ahve to fiddle with the engines.
I decided to make a Newton mod; right now it just needs AI. Good practice for when I start working on TechMod again, and I'm sure there are people out there that would like to use Newtonian movement, but standard SE4 otherwise.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

December 3rd, 2001, 12:41 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
OK, here it is. Standard SE4, Sir Isaac Newton style.
Now Version 1.1.. more complete, less filling! (patched the neutral AIs, removed excess files)
1007333287.zip
Phoenix-D
[ 02 December 2001: Message edited by: Phoenix-D ]
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

December 3rd, 2001, 03:32 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
Posts: 521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How about Newtonian engines as standard?
Another idea to help solve the engine problem and give people option to make larger engines (not just 10 kt) some that could be as much as 30 or 40 and would cost a lot higher to allow people to put on larger/more expensive engines that would give a ship greater movement (like instead of 6 could give 20 bonus moves)
__________________
Come join the forces of democracy and fight for independence from Totalitarianism, Dictatorships, Emperors and Empresses, Oligarchys and Fundamentalists at SE4 by Committee
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|