|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

January 28th, 2007, 12:56 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
Quote:
DRG said:
Quote:
VDS said:
Glad to be of some help, however minute it is.
Re: the size on the para teams, I wasn't sure about it either but I have never seen another unit with crew 6 being size 0. Not saying that there are none, I certainly could be mistaken...
|
Fun fact ---There are 33997 units in all the OOB's in MBT That means there are are Two million, three hundred and eleven thousand ,seven hundred and ninety six individual data entries that all have to have to be "correct" before nobody complains anymore <G> And that's just the units. There are weapons and formations that also figure into the equation
Don
|
Yikes! I guessed it was a a lot but those #s are staggering. I want you to know that my "error posts" are not critiques or meant to be snide, I have nothing but admiration for the SP-CAMO team. The way you guys support the game and take pride in being as accurate as possible is THE reason I finally decided to buy the CD version, even though I've only been able to find part-time work since the first time I posted here.
Quote:
DRG said:
Another fun fact, your Belgian 6 man para unit are not alone in being size zero, There are 117 other infantry units in the OOB's with more than 5 men and size zero ( an issue, as I said, that is under review )
Don
|
LOL - I certainly was mistaken!
|

January 28th, 2007, 02:57 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,814 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
Quote:
VDS said:
Yikes! I guessed it was a lot but those #s are staggering. I want you to know that my "error posts" are not critiques or meant to be snide, I have nothing but admiration for the SP-CAMO team. The way you guys support the game and take pride in being as accurate as possible is THE reason I finally decided to buy the CD version, even though I've only been able to find part-time work since the first time I posted here.
|
And I didn't take it as snide. ( some few do come off with "attitude", you don't  )
The crew issue actually affected 8 other OOB's as well with the very best one being Israel where the crew inservice dates were 1948 - 1955 ( !! ) However, "crew" is the one and ONLY unit in the game where in service dates have no affect in the game. Crews will pop out of Israeli tanks past 1955 without problem becasue the code ejects a crew, if it survives, no matter what and that is why there is only one "crew" for each OOB and that's why they all must be in unit slot 249 ( and why there must always be a Barge in slot 247 )
Don
|

February 12th, 2007, 02:54 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
Corrections to A109 Agustas in Belgian OOB
Mostly minor stuff, but for the sake of accuracy the following designations are now used by the Heli Wing of the Belgian Air Force.
Correct designation of the Belgian A109 is A109BA (for Belgian Army). With the following roles :
A109BA AH(L)-TOW2A = Anti-Tank
Is Unit 207 Agusta A109HA in Belgian OOB - should be configured with TOW2A Missiles, not TOW2, otherwise correct.
Should be renamed to A109BA AH/L-TOW (?)
A109BA AH(L)-Rockets =Ground Support
Is Unit 268 Agusta A109 in Belgian OOB- should have no 12.7MG, just the rockets. (May have thermal sights, still researching)
Should be renamed to A109BA AH/L-R (?)
A109BA UH(L)-AE =MedEvac
A109BA UH(L)-Tpt =Transport
A109BA OH(L) =Observation
Is Unit 208 Agusta A109 in Belgian OOB- covers all three roles accurately enough.
Should be renamed to A109BA UH/L (?)
A109BA UH(L)-MG =Armed Recce
Is not present in OOB, should be added with 2 x FN MAG MMG, Weapon # 23, each w/ 20xHE Ammo, no passenger capacity, and Vision 20. (May have thermal sights, still researching)
Should be named to A109BA UH/L-MG (?)
Also availablity for all models should start from January 1992, not 1993.
Links -
http://www.baha.be/Webpages/Navigato...bat_010704.htm
http://belmilac.wetpaint.com/page/Agusta+A109BA+Hirundo
http://www.baha.be/Webpages/Navigato...1945_today.htm
http://www.ailes-militaires-belges.b...g-grosplan.jpg
|

February 12th, 2007, 02:55 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
|

March 12th, 2007, 06:38 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,814 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
The problem with this otherwise good idea is that renders the Belgians without a "heavy lifting" helicopter after 1998. So either the Army "borrows" these from the Federal Police or we find something else to take it's place or we end the formation in 1998
This page .. http://www.baha.be/Webpages/Navigato...1945_today.htm
says they ended service in 1998 anyway
Aerospatiale SA330L/H Puma OL-G01 > OL-G03 3 07/73 > 05/98
Don
|

March 21st, 2007, 04:47 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
Quote:
DRG said:
The problem with this otherwise good idea is that renders the Belgians without a "heavy lifting" helicopter after 1998. So either the Army "borrows" these from the Federal Police or we find something else to take it's place or we end the formation in 1998
This page .. http://www.baha.be/Webpages/Navigato...1945_today.htm
says they ended service in 1998 anyway
Aerospatiale SA330L/H Puma OL-G01 > OL-G03 3 07/73 > 05/98
Don
|
There are plans to buy 10 NH90 helos, but who knows when they will be available. 2010 at the earliest would be my guess and most (if not all) will be used by the Navy.
http://www.luchtzak.be/article10790.html
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...ates/index.php
|

June 5th, 2007, 04:10 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
Quote:
(...)
The problem with this otherwise good idea is that renders the Belgians without a "heavy lifting" helicopter after 1998. So either the Army "borrows" these from the Federal Police or we find something else to take it's place or we end the formation in 1998
(...)
Don
|
when we are on belgian territory, we mostly use our SeaKing for "heavy" lifting (it can transport one to two fully equiped infantry section) or the A109BA UH(L) (wich can transport one section).
When we are in operations, we are also using other nations choppers, often the french Puma.
About the NH90, they will be 4 NFH version that will be delivered in 2009, 4 TTH version (for wich i don't know the delivery date) and 2 SAR version that will be delivered in 2008 to replace the SeaKings.
cheers,
Jan
|

January 28th, 2008, 02:54 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,814 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: Errors in Belgian OOB
Quote:
Jan said:when we are on belgian territory, we mostly use our SeaKing for "heavy" lifting (it can transport one to two fully equiped infantry section) or the A109BA UH(L) (wich can transport one section).
Jan
|
Hello Jan
This would imply the SeaKing is still in service with the Belgian armed forces???
Don
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|