|
|
|
|
 |

February 24th, 2007, 01:45 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
How are people's mages and sages doing?
Old age is rough! LOL *comfort oldies*
|

February 24th, 2007, 01:55 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
Hahahha yeah the Well of Misery has me spooked also. Ermor is topping almost all charts. Scary.
|

February 24th, 2007, 02:09 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
Where the heck is ermor even? I (thankfully) have not come into contact with the dark one.
|

February 24th, 2007, 02:17 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
151 I believe?
|

February 24th, 2007, 06:54 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 790
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
Its funny that the leader of Midgard is scared about ermor. Especially the graphs.
Didn't midgard has more than the half troops of ermor? I think this guys aren't banishable, has more hipoints, most of them better attack/defence values and the vans have the glamour ability which is even unblessed a real pain.
Besides this midgard has with patala the most provinces and together with agartha and patala the best income.
I would be by far more alerted if i were a neighbor of midgard.
The only thing i would fear from ermor would be the population killing dominion, the rest can be banished.
Don't overrate LA ermor. They always best in army size graph on the start of the game and should be best in gems too because they couldn't maintain any other army than a casted one.
And for the giants: you appeared on our doorstep. You decided to attack caelum and we decided that 3 to 1 against caelum isn't fair.
|

February 24th, 2007, 11:15 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Norriton, PA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
Hey, 3 against me isnt fair either! 
|

February 24th, 2007, 01:22 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: meredith, nh
Posts: 331
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Quick and The Dead (Accelerated Start) [OP
I'll confirm that Ermor's capital is in 151.
It's hard to muster enough banishers quickly enough, but things went better last turn with about 220 less undead to worry about. However, not much of a dent was made in the total number of Ermorian troops.
I agree that 3 to 1 vs. Caelem was unfair. It should have been 4 to 1, to give all of us attackers a fair chance!
Meanwhile, if anyone has made any agreements proposed by Pangaea, they are worthless! He won't hesistate to "interpret" the wording of his own proposals to suit his treacherous intentions!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|