The Quick and The Dead [ Calmon WINS!! ] - Page 15

Ironhawk · #**141** February 24th, 2007, 01:55 AM

Hahahha yeah the Well of Misery has me spooked also. Ermor is topping almost all charts. Scary.

msew · #**142** February 24th, 2007, 02:09 AM

Where the heck is ermor even? I (thankfully) have not come into contact with the dark one.

KissBlade · #**143** February 24th, 2007, 02:17 AM

151 I believe?

calmon · #**144** February 24th, 2007, 06:54 AM

Its funny that the leader of Midgard is scared about ermor. Especially the graphs.

Didn't midgard has more than the half troops of ermor? I think this guys aren't banishable, has more hipoints, most of them better attack/defence values and the vans have the glamour ability which is even unblessed a real pain.

Besides this midgard has with patala the most provinces and together with agartha and patala the best income.

I would be by far more alerted if i were a neighbor of midgard.

The only thing i would fear from ermor would be the population killing dominion, the rest can be banished.

Don't overrate LA ermor. They always best in army size graph on the start of the game and should be best in gems too because they couldn't maintain any other army than a casted one.

And for the giants: you appeared on our doorstep. You decided to attack caelum and we decided that 3 to 1 against caelum isn't fair.

FAJ · #**145** February 24th, 2007, 11:15 AM

Hey, 3 against me isnt fair either!

solo · #**146** February 24th, 2007, 01:22 PM

I'll confirm that Ermor's capital is in 151.

It's hard to muster enough banishers quickly enough, but things went better last turn with about 220 less undead to worry about. However, not much of a dent was made in the total number of Ermorian troops.

I agree that 3 to 1 vs. Caelem was unfair. It should have been 4 to 1, to give all of us attackers a fair chance!

Meanwhile, if anyone has made any agreements proposed by Pangaea, they are worthless! He won't hesistate to "interpret" the wording of his own proposals to suit his treacherous intentions!

KissBlade · #**147** February 24th, 2007, 05:18 PM

May I request that because of recent server problems, hosting be delayed till everyone gets their turn in? I know Argatha specifically stated that he can't get his turn in time because of some trip he had to take?

mivayan · #**148** February 24th, 2007, 05:52 PM

Quote:

solo said:
Meanwhile, if anyone has made any agreements proposed by Pangaea, they are worthless! He won't hesistate to "interpret" the wording of his own proposals to suit his treacherous intentions!

Pangeas proposal during turn3, which was accepted during the same turn: "I wonder if you are interested in a 5-turn non-aggression pact after the ceasefire with pangea? If so I'll stay on my side of the water, so province 83 is yours."

Pangea interpreted it thus: all parts of the agreement end after 5 turns, and the border drawn up is only to clarify which indeps goes to whom.

Utgard interpreted it as: pangea promise never to attack province 83, even if we are at war later on with utgard attacking from province 83.

Pangea finds utgard's interpretation ridicolous, but notices that the message might have been slightly unclear.

solo · #**149** February 24th, 2007, 07:44 PM

It's not an interpretation! It's simply just what you said.

If I agree to your desired NAP, then you agree to stay on your side and leave #83 for me.

The proposal might have been ridiculous, from your point of view, but you were its author! I had to laugh and immediately agree!

Of course I could surmise your evil intentions, but even if your promise was counter to them, shouldn't you be bound by what you put in writing and agreed to?

Kydorias · #**150** February 25th, 2007, 01:29 AM

Very odd. With the last turn generation, one of my Sages decided to stop researching and take a jaunt over to one of my other fortresses. I've never seen that happen before.

I've asked him to kindly return, then I'll flog him and toss him back into the laboratory where he belongs.