|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |

March 7th, 2007, 08:55 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,678
Thanks: 4,113
Thanked 5,900 Times in 2,905 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
I've already started mine....  both K1 and K2
Don
|

March 8th, 2007, 01:36 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HQ-RS, Kabul, Afghanistan
Posts: 168
Thanks: 66
Thanked 28 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
Here is some more from Korea Times. I'm not sure if these guys have any clue as to what they are talking about:
Said to be the only tank in the world that can wade through up to 13.5 feet of water, the so-called XK2 Black Panther is a followup to the country's K1 unit (the X will get dropped once these go into production), and is so advanced that the official in charge of the project immodestly boasts that it has "more suberb capabilities than any other existing tank." Some of these "superb capabilities" include a 120-millimeter gun firing at 15 rounds per minute, smart munitions that can avoid obstacles to reach their targets, an active defense system against incoming artillery, and a special suspension that allows for three distinct configurations and downhill firing. With a top road speed of 44mph the XK2 is certainly no slouch, and with an estimated cost of $8.5 million per vehicle, it's certainly no bargain either. Combined with the country's already impressive army of autonomous vehicles, robotic sentries, and multi-wheeled killbots, the Black Panther should make potential aggressors think twice before they launch an attack against the Koreans (or at least make sure that they have a few good EMP's).
|

April 7th, 2007, 09:37 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London (Great Britain)
Posts: 852
Thanks: 207
Thanked 176 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
Well, I can understand why they have to talk all this shop. What with crazy Kim in the north and the costs of the project and all. They clearly had to spend a lot of money on it, after all designing a new MBT is not cheap. I suppose Korean taxpayers are just like any others so they need to know the money was well spent. Telling them Korea has the best tank in the world might just do that. Its better than anything they have in the North. Thats a bonus I suppose.
__________________
"Wir Deutschen sollten die Wahrheit auch dann ertragen lernen, wenn sie für uns günstig ist."
|

June 29th, 2007, 04:15 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Update on the K-2
Just keep that bit of info somewhere handy in case it changes again, but:
Looks like Turkey has selected a new tank a last (again)!
Of course, remember that it's at least the third time a winner was declared by external soucres in ten years, so let's wait and see.
|

June 29th, 2007, 06:46 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vilnius
Posts: 31
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Update on the K-2
150 Horsepower tank? Greeks, beware  I bet it's 1500 though.
|

March 8th, 2007, 04:26 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
Quote:
DRG said:I've already started mine.... both K1 and K2
Don
|
Great! 
I can't wait to see them, your Type-90 was awesome already!
|

March 8th, 2007, 10:24 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
heck, if it really has that RoF, has the active anti arty capability (which the US pioneered ages ago) and all the rest of those gadgets i take my sarcasm back...it does sound pretty good. still trying to find out you "autoseal" a main gun though, if it is done down at the beach level how would you evacuate the barrell afterwards? spinning it around with centrifugal force  )? treadheads enlighten us..
autoloaders are totally the way to go, to date only the yanks can afford to train their tank crews in combat conditions enough to really get a respectable RoF; read about a German vs US competition once in which the M1's were able to have twice the RoF of the Germans simply b/c their loaders were not doing the job for the first time...
|

March 8th, 2007, 12:14 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
"active anti arty capability"
What would that be ? An anti ATGM system which got mangled in translation?
|

March 8th, 2007, 02:55 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: new S Korean tank...
A hard-kill anti-ATGM system with anti-top-attack capability?
That was studied at some point for the Leclerc IIRC.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|