|
|
|
 |

January 10th, 2002, 02:39 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: UM question
I hope we don't lose SE.org, if we do we might lose the mod and that would suck even more.
[ June 14, 2003, 18:07: Message edited by: General Talashar ]
|

January 11th, 2002, 05:10 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: UM question
Oh yeah,
The UM is great stuff, and I'd absolutely buy the CD (of course I'm in Canada so 5-10 USD is like 7-18 CdnD. Don't suppose we could get it on par, eh?  ).
Oh, and sorry 'bout the confusion on the Gravity tech stuff, I thought that I had communicated that I was offering it to both the "Ultimate Universe" and the "P&N Universe". In both cases I gave the rights away to the creators of these two mods, so I'm sure that both mutated to better fit their respective universes.
Happy New Year and all that
jimbob
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|

January 11th, 2002, 06:40 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: MI,USA
Posts: 167
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: UM question
Hadrian Aventine, I'm playing with starting a strategy guide/tactical. your hosting would fit in with what I'm thinking. A pure stategic\Tactical site. I threw the idea to the message board and I think that the ideas would meld nicely.email me at petemmer@earthlink.net
|

January 11th, 2002, 03:52 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: UM question
I agree, I'm all for buying the mod if it helps keep Se.org Online!
[ June 14, 2003, 18:05: Message edited by: General Talashar ]
|

January 15th, 2002, 03:13 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: UM question
quote: The Religious techs are broken down by religions with each religion having seperate strengths and weaknesses.
So, does this mean that we wouldn't choose "religious" as a racial trait. Rather each religion is a separate racial trait? This would be good because it would maintain game balance.
UM is great, keep it coming!
jimbob
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|

January 15th, 2002, 04:28 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 901
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: UM question
I hope it's kept to the most basic portions, i would hate to see Se.org endorse any kind of religion in the UM.
[ June 14, 2003, 18:04: Message edited by: General Talashar ]
|

January 16th, 2002, 02:13 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,066
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: UM question
Buddhism is a form of pantheism as is Hinduism, not theism. da?
The development of technology depends more on a generalized philosophy or world view rather than a more specific religeon.
It would be easier to script techs based on broad world views rather than religeons. The tech areas would then also be easier for the end user to understand.
You could also do it by paradigms, but you'd have to invent most of your own because they are really broad.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|