|
|
|
 |

March 18th, 2007, 02:27 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
Well, the money interface is pretty broken. There is a thread about it in the atariboards. I remember that it goes like this: The amount that is displayed is not really your actual treasure, a few budget "positions" are missing.
|

March 18th, 2007, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 121
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
Well, I reinstalled MOO3 last night. Got the Tropical and 1024x768 mods. Game isn't half bad now.
(Yes, I'm being serious.)
|

March 18th, 2007, 04:57 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 689
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
I didn't really like the high-res mod. Something about the interface didn't feel right to me. It's nice to have the lists show more items, though.
|

March 18th, 2007, 05:18 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
There have been a few nice mods. And the game is also very easy modable. Although the developer/publisher never made any docs regarding that.
They acted like: "Hey you got the game from us - now play it. Oh, there are a few bugs? Ok, we will make 2 patches and then thats it - no more support - 2 patches should be enough to fix the game (even though we released it in beta stage), we don't care about this MoO series at all. Be lucky that you got a new MoO. Ah, and the game is modable, but you have to figure out things alone, we won't help you with it.
More patches, more fixes, a developer/publisher that would have cared for the game itself, the MoO series and the fans would not have buried the game. The game was released on 02/25/2003. The latest patch was released 07/18/2003. I do not know if it is common practise that a game is abandoned after 6 month, even if the developer and the publisher know that there are many bugs left.
The game IS good with the additional fan-made fixes/patches. But it will never be as good as SEV due to the reasons stated above.
|

March 18th, 2007, 06:23 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 121
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
It's Atari. They just suck no matter what.
|

March 18th, 2007, 06:46 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bielefeld
Posts: 2,035
Thanks: 33
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
Yes, i agree. Atari is by FAR the worst publisher out there. I figured as much after they abandoned Temple of Elemental Evil.
|

March 18th, 2007, 07:17 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 689
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: MOO3
Quicksilver was a pretty decent developer company, I'd say. They really listened to fan input, they were ambitious, and they listened to my favorite music, Tool. Not much they can do when the publishers cuts the funding, though.
I thought I read somewhere about MoO4 being planned by some other company.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|