|
|
|
 |
|

May 1st, 2007, 09:23 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
Sombre, what are you talking about? LA Agartha does have the basic Agarthan Infantry (unit 1355) as recruitable and so does MA Agartha. Both had it in 3.06 already and nothing has changed in that regard with the new patch.
|

May 1st, 2007, 09:42 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
I have no idea about the new patch, but either my copy of Conceptual Balance Mod is different from yours,... or we're interpreting the title of this thread differently. When I say 'did you mean for X' I'm referring to QM and the Conceptual Balance Mod.
Attached is a screenshot of the CBM LA agartha recruitment screen with a piece of 'code' from the CBM dm file. No 1355 there.
|

May 1st, 2007, 10:09 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
Ah, sorry, my mistake. Got confused for a moment. The Agarthan infantry is available in the vanilla game, so their omission from the CB seems strange. Especially since that unit is hardly a balance issue in and of itself.
|

May 1st, 2007, 10:25 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
No problem, I probably should have posted my comments in the mod forum CBM thread anyway.
|

May 1st, 2007, 12:03 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
Ah, thanks for pointing this out, yes it's a bug (with CB). There is a similar bug effecting EA Ermor Flamen, both should be fixed next version.
|

May 1st, 2007, 12:31 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
Actually I was meaning to ask you - there are a few bits in the CB 'code' where you #clearrec a nation and put the numbers back in.
Why? Have some nations had units removed/added? I can understand if you've made a unit cap only by assigning it to a site, but for some of the nations where you've #clearrec'd them that isn't the case.
|

May 1st, 2007, 01:17 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance (Discussion)
Quote:
Sombre said:
Actually I was meaning to ask you - there are a few bits in the CB 'code' where you #clearrec a nation and put the numbers back in.
Why? Have some nations had units removed/added? I can understand if you've made a unit cap only by assigning it to a site, but for some of the nations where you've #clearrec'd them that isn't the case.
|
Those are mostly to accomplish adding in a new scout unit that doesn't have the same ID as the indy scout, in order to change just the indy scout's price.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|